| 11 Aug 2025 |
 Toma | and also changing the task cancellation logic | 15:39:24 |
| Toma | but if it's not even timing out, then IDK | 15:39:34 |
 emily | my guess is that the v4 timeout fails and that causes an internal fallback to v6 | 15:39:49 |
| emily | but I haven't read requests code | 15:40:00 |
| emily | I agree that async is probably a good idea | 15:40:09 |
| Toma | and by async you mean? | 15:40:55 |
 K900 | asyncio | 15:41:05 |
| K900 | Instead of manual threading | 15:41:10 |
| Toma | how big is asyncio's closure? | 15:41:35 |
| Toma | og its part of python | 15:42:00 |
| Toma | * oh its part of python | 15:42:04 |
| Toma | never touched async python and wasn't really planning to | 15:42:37 |
| K900 | You'll probably also want httpx as an async HTTP client library | 15:42:39 |
| Toma | maybe, I don't know | 15:42:50 |
| Toma | If someone wants to improve it, go ahead, I don't really write python that much | 15:43:25 |
| emily | could RIIR :P | 15:47:18 |
| Toma | the vendoring of the deps of the rust implementation would be interesting... | 15:49:42 |
| Toma | I guess we could use importCargoLock | 15:49:55 |
| Toma | but I don't think we should focus on that, we have more pressing issues, I think, e.g. lessening the cache burden, duplicated deps | 15:51:48 |
| Toma | Also, interesting sidenote:
I encountered this around a month ago: https://github.com/flatpak/flatpak-builder-tools/blob/master/cargo/flatpak-cargo-generator.py
Flatpak also has their own custom vendoring script... | 15:53:28 |
| 12 Aug 2025 |
| emily | is it possible to build rustc with only the Cranelift backend, not LLVM? | 15:46:28 |
