| 8 May 2025 |
 @tebro:matrix.org | I made a Matrix account just to follow this problem to see when Zed is getting the new version in. Seems quite complicated. | 13:22:20 |
 98765abc | Redacted or Malformed Event | 13:52:47 |
| 98765abc | * Noob Question.https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/blob/7fc3a8e2a7535fbdea3e31e3cba731c5825f7816/pkgs/development/tools/rust/rustup/0001-dynamically-patchelf-binaries.patch#L41 Is possible to use 'which rustup' to get rustup's
nix-support/ld-wrapper.sh
?
| 13:54:07 |
 nyanbinary 🏳️⚧️ | cc: Winter (she/her) | 14:38:35 |
|  @saiko:knifepoint.net changed their profile picture. | 18:03:21 |
| 9 May 2025 |
| @saiko:knifepoint.net changed their display name from dblsaiko ⚧︎ 🔪 to Katalin 🔪. | 01:16:45 |
|  @bloxx12:matrix.org joined the room. | 22:48:56 |
| 10 May 2025 |
|  lily 🏳️⚧️ joined the room. | 00:12:41 |
 @awwpotato:envs.net | could someone help me debug https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/405768? I have glib in the pkgconfig path but cargo thinks otherwise. | 03:03:09 |
 Mr. Defenestrator | It's because gobject-sys relies on gobject-2.0 >= 2.83 - the version of glib in the PKG_CONFIG_PATH is glib-2.82.5. | 05:40:07 |
| @awwpotato:envs.net | hmm looks like it will be fixed once staging next is merged, I'll leave it as a draft in the mean time. | 17:23:44 |
|  @r522:matrix.org changed their display name from 522 to 522 [it/its][ΘΔ]. | 18:06:53 |
 niklaskorz | @qyliss:fairydust.space I'll take a look at the Rust std docs issue. Though if the patch did suddenly cause std docs for other targets to disappear that'd also mean upstream Rust would be affected, as they merged the patch in February 😳 (which would then be included in 1.87.0) | 20:54:52 |
 Alyssa Ross | In reply to @niklaskorz:matrix.org
@qyliss:fairydust.space I'll take a look at the Rust std docs issue. Though if the patch did suddenly cause std docs for other targets to disappear that'd also mean upstream Rust would be affected, as they merged the patch in February 😳 (which would then be included in 1.87.0) I think I found that it wasn't actually applying the patch that broke it, but adding the ebpf target | 22:12:45 |
| niklaskorz | In reply to @qyliss:fairydust.space
I think I found that it wasn't actually applying the patch that broke it, but adding the ebpf target Yeah I have a suspicion, commented it on the issue | 23:30:21 |
| niklaskorz | Basically it's installing the docs once for each target | 23:30:31 |
| niklaskorz | And each time removes the previous targets docs | 23:30:44 |
| niklaskorz | So the last target to be installed (bpf) is whose docs end up in the output | 23:31:02 |
