| 23 Nov 2025 |
 hexa | 
Download image.png | 16:15:03 |
| hexa | https://nix.dev/guides/best-practices.html | 16:15:15 |
 zitrone | ja aber da hätte man einfach das ganze inherit weglassen können, naja | 16:16:35 |
| hexa | ja, wo leute zusammen kommen passieren dumme dinge | 16:18:41 |
| hexa | manchmal braucht es nicht mal das | 16:18:57 |
 grimmauld (any/all) | Tbh ich will envirnment.systemPackages = [ inherit [pkgs] curl jq hello ]; oder so | 16:19:17 |
| grimmauld (any/all) | also quasi inherit für listen | 16:19:25 |
| grimmauld (any/all) | ist halt problematisch, weil listen space-seperated sind | 16:19:52 |
| zitrone | https://wiki.lix.systems/books/lix-contributors/page/nix-lang-v2#bkmrk-set-slicing | 16:21:06 |
| zitrone | * set slicing https://wiki.lix.systems/books/lix-contributors/page/nix-lang-v2#bkmrk-set-slicing | 16:21:17 |
| grimmauld (any/all) | ja, das wäre z.b. okay | 16:22:24 |
 piegames | In reply to @grimmauld:m.grimmauld.de
Tbh ich will envirnment.systemPackages = [ inherit [pkgs] curl jq hello ]; oder so pkgs.[curl jq hello] (one day) | 16:39:56 |
| hexa | I don't fancy the way it looks 😄 | 16:40:42 |
 pentane ⭔ | Julia also has a syntax for vectorizing functions that looks something like this | 17:00:25 |
| pentane ⭔ | basically, if you have a function callef foo, you'd normally invoke it as foo(x), but you can also invoke it for each member of a list by writing foo.([a, b, c]) which essentially is the same as [foo(a), foo(b), foo(c)] | 17:01:38 |
| pentane ⭔ | makes scientific computing a whole lot easier | 17:02:00 |
| piegames | That is a weird way to write a map ^^ | 17:04:51 |
| pentane ⭔ | yeah, vectorization in julia basically is the same as map for 1D arrays :D | 17:05:26 |
| pentane ⭔ | (random thought: in Haskell terms, multidimensional arrays are functors too, so Julia vectorization basically is 1:1 the same as Haskell fmap) | 17:15:01 |
 Atemu | Now let's sprinkle some clojure into this where attrsets are just functions you call with a key to get the corresponding value and we could get this syntax using julia-like vectorisation | 17:40:00 |
 Grimmauld (any/all) | doesn't numpy/scipy do the same? | 18:03:27 |
| pentane ⭔ | haven't used numpy in like 4 years but yeah, iirc numpy has np.vectorize which basically does the same but without the syntactic sugar | 18:19:57 |
| grimmauld (any/all) | don't even need that: | 18:24:47 |
| grimmauld (any/all) | 
Download image.png | 18:24:50 |
| grimmauld (any/all) | moment was ist denn eigentlich mit der Sprache passiert XD
Oh well | 18:25:38 |
| pentane ⭔ | das ist schlechtes sprschdesign imo, weil z.B. elementwise quadrieren von den Elementen einer Matrix was anderes ist, als die Matrix als ganzes zu quadrieren | 19:01:34 |
| pentane ⭔ | * | 19:01:41 |
| grimmauld (any/all) | stimmt schon | 19:01:58 |
| grimmauld (any/all) | wobei matrix quadrieren selten nützlich ist... | 19:02:48 |
| grimmauld (any/all) | nicht nie, aber na gut | 19:03:18 |
