| 9 Dec 2024 |
 Fernando Rodrigues | In reply to @emma:rory.gay
also about #11, was the swearing implication intentional? xD That was long before my time, haha. I've only done Xen onwards. | 22:02:19 |
 @emma:rory.gay | ah | 22:02:24 |
| @emma:rory.gay | yeah no i kinda want to keep the non-corporate feel alive tbh | 22:02:33 |
| @emma:rory.gay | lets not make nix/nixos sterile and boring :D | 22:02:45 |
| Fernando Rodrigues | How do we do that while still keeping the icons recognisable? | 22:02:57 |
| Fernando Rodrigues | for instance, how do we show the tagging efforts from the categorisation team without using a tag? | 22:03:21 |
| Fernando Rodrigues | A skeuomorphic tag, maybe? I'm not sure how good that would look. Icons can't have too many details. | 22:03:52 |
| Fernando Rodrigues | In reply to @emma:rory.gay
the staging one could probably use the generic git icon instead? or a 3-way merge icon. review requests doesnt really make sense to me despite using git day in day out Also, wouldn't the git icon be exactly the same as the current icon, but inside a rounded square and rotated? | 22:04:55 |
| Fernando Rodrigues | In reply to @emma:rory.gay
the staging one could probably use the generic git icon instead? or a 3-way merge icon. review requests doesnt really make sense to me despite using git day in day out * Also, wouldn't the git icon be sort of the same as the current icon, but inside a rounded square and rotated? | 22:05:09 |
| @emma:rory.gay | i hate how there's no iconology for non-one-on-one merging lol | 22:05:42 |
