| 4 Apr 2024 |
 raitobezarius | Exporter can automatically create an empty entry and wait for someone to fill it | 21:55:38 |
| raitobezarius | Or synchronize the topic or something | 21:55:45 |
 @joepie91:pixie.town | right, I'm not really sure where the disagreement is because functionally these look like the same thing to me | 21:56:09 |
| @joepie91:pixie.town | I was proposing an auto export mainly because it is a) easy to implement b) easy to maintain | 21:56:24 |
| raitobezarius | So an automated exporter can never do the work of an editor | 21:56:28 |
| raitobezarius | But an editor can do the work of an automated exporter | 21:56:34 |
| @joepie91:pixie.town | it's not necessarily the perfect option but it is certainly better than what we have right now | 21:56:35 |
| raitobezarius | I don't know if this makes my position clearer | 21:56:43 |
| raitobezarius | In reply to @joepie91:pixie.town
I was proposing an auto export mainly because it is a) easy to implement b) easy to maintain Right, tbh, I'm burned out on writing any Matrix code in general | 21:57:08 |
| raitobezarius | I still have the scars of the TWIN bot which is still dysfunctional for non-permissioned users alas | 21:57:22 |
| raitobezarius | But both approaches are complementary | 21:57:47 |
| @joepie91:pixie.town | understandabld | 22:00:01 |
| @joepie91:pixie.town | * understandable | 22:00:03 |
| @joepie91:pixie.town | I mean, if we have a volunteer for making/curating/maintaining a list (patka?) then that's also a good way to get started, I was just originally working under the assumption that there wouldn't be :) | 22:00:39 |
| raitobezarius | yep | 22:01:17 |
