| 6 Jun 2021 |
 Sandro | Does it have a unread line= | 04:09:31 |
| Sandro | * Does it have a unread line? | 04:09:33 |
 colemickens 🏳️🌈 | In reply to @sandro:supersandro.de
Does it have a unread line? I don't think so, from what I can tell after checking a few rooms. | 04:12:39 |
|  notgne2 joined the room. | 06:16:29 |
|  ToxicFrog changed their display name from froxictog to ToxicFrog. | 12:53:06 |
| ToxicFrog set a profile picture. | 15:37:15 |
| ToxicFrog left the room. | 15:40:27 |
|  maralorn joined the room. | 23:42:50 |
| maralorn | Has anyone else experienced that clicking links in element-desktop fails to find the running browser session and trys to open a new one? | 23:43:35 |
| maralorn | It feels like some kind of sandboxing issue. | 23:43:47 |
| maralorn | Huh, probably wrong channel, sorry. | 23:44:18 |
| 7 Jun 2021 |
| maralorn left the room. | 02:38:54 |
|  David Arnold (blaggacao) joined the room. | 04:12:11 |
| David Arnold (blaggacao) | How does matrix discussion relate to discourse? With so many rooms, there is a lot of (good!) segmentation. But all in all ot also overlaps a bit woth discourse. | 04:24:45 |
| David Arnold (blaggacao) | * How does matrix discussion relate to discourse? With so many rooms, there is a lot of (good!) segmentation. But all in all it also overlaps a bit with discourse. | 04:25:06 |
| David Arnold (blaggacao) | Maybe it could be a good idea if we could map matrix room hierarchy to discourse topics? | 04:27:20 |
| David Arnold (blaggacao) | * Maybe it could be a good idea if we could map matrix room hierarchy to discourse topics? -- to present to people unified semantics | 04:27:49 |
| David Arnold (blaggacao) | And we maybe can clarify a little more what modes of discussion should go where... | 04:28:41 |
| David Arnold (blaggacao) | Like: discussion -> matrix / intermediate conclusions & outcomes -> discourse. | 04:29:07 |
| David Arnold (blaggacao) | Related, but I wrote it completely unaware of this room diversification and the dynamic here: https://discourse.nixos.org/t/discourse-per-thread-chat-rooms/13396 | 04:30:50 |
| David Arnold (blaggacao) | hexa Quick corrections must ne ok over in the other room, otherwise we get into hell's kitchen. 😆 | 13:27:28 |
| David Arnold (blaggacao) | * hexa Quick corrections must be ok over in the other room, otherwise we get into hell's kitchen. 😆 | 13:27:34 |
 hexa | The reason -suggestions is not for conversations is, that an admin needs to be able to go through the suggestions and implement them. If there is noise in between it makes it unneccessarily harder. | 13:27:37 |
| David Arnold (blaggacao) | I understand. | 13:28:15 |
| David Arnold (blaggacao) | An alternative could be argument here: "please remove there" | 13:28:32 |
|  Linux Hackerman joined the room. | 13:29:58 |
| David Arnold (blaggacao) | Linux Hackerman did my reply actually resolve your suggestion? (In that case we can delete there) | 13:30:43 |
| David Arnold (blaggacao) | Redacted or Malformed Event | 13:30:52 |
| David Arnold (blaggacao) | @lukegb doesn't seem to be here 🤐 | 13:31:27 |
 Las | Discourse could be built on top of Matrix TBH | 13:34:59 |
