| 9 Dec 2024 |
 Fernando Rodrigues | In reply to @emma:rory.gay
the staging one could probably use the generic git icon instead? or a 3-way merge icon. review requests doesnt really make sense to me despite using git day in day out Also, wouldn't the git icon be exactly the same as the current icon, but inside a rounded square and rotated? | 22:04:55 |
| Fernando Rodrigues | In reply to @emma:rory.gay
the staging one could probably use the generic git icon instead? or a 3-way merge icon. review requests doesnt really make sense to me despite using git day in day out * Also, wouldn't the git icon be sort of the same as the current icon, but inside a rounded square and rotated? | 22:05:09 |
 @emma:rory.gay | i hate how there's no iconology for non-one-on-one merging lol | 22:05:42 |
| Fernando Rodrigues | Well, perhaps the idea of using git and branches as the metaphor is wrong. What comes to mind when you think `staging`? | 22:06:20 |
| @emma:rory.gay | git and branches lol | 22:06:33 |
| @emma:rory.gay | well actually no... you say just the word staging, right? | 22:06:48 |
| Fernando Rodrigues | i've had the idea of "staging area" like a large open room or an actual stage. | 22:07:10 |
| @emma:rory.gay | makes me think of server management | 22:07:11 |
| Fernando Rodrigues | but i'm not sure how many people would get that. | 22:07:21 |
| Fernando Rodrigues | In reply to @emma:rory.gay
makes me think of server management considering we have Infrastructure, System Operations, Networking and probably a few other server-management-related rooms, I think that metaphor will be overused very soon. | 22:08:03 |
