Matrix Meta (Nix) | 628 Members | |
| Discuss your proposals for the Matrix space here, before suggesting them in #matrix-suggestions:nixos.org | 180 Servers |
| Sender | Message | Time |
|---|---|---|
| 19 Jan 2024 | ||
| 07:05:58 | ||
| 09:24:01 | ||
| 21 Jan 2024 | ||
| 07:48:48 | ||
In reply to @hexa:lossy.networkOh, I wasn't able to see this before. I was just looking at the new topic names and I personally think they are much better! I also like the separation of matrix discussion and matrix proposals. | 17:09:31 | |
| Thanks for taking the suggestion! | 17:09:44 | |
| 23 Jan 2024 | ||
| https://github.com/progval/matrix2051/issues/57#issuecomment-1906273296 someone fwded me this, apparently #nix:nixos.org might be misconfigured and missing a canonical room alias? | 16:07:08 | |
| did a thing, and replied on the issue | 20:27:16 | |
| 22:18:10 | ||
| 29 Jan 2024 | ||
| 05:33:16 | ||
| 31 Jan 2024 | ||
| 03:36:08 | ||
| 06:21:45 | ||
| 16:08:11 | ||
| 1 Feb 2024 | ||
| 05:45:09 | ||
| 2 Feb 2024 | ||
| 07:11:07 | ||
| 17:50:06 | ||
| So, yeah, I dunno, as I was saying in #matrix-suggestions:nixos.org , but should have said in here, I feel like the #nix:nixos.org is kind of being overused while others are underused. I feel like we should try to delegate more to the less-used rooms.
Points against:
| 18:57:47 | |
| Of ambiguous connotation:
| 19:58:38 | |
| Against: the more rooms there are, the more people are confused which one to use (recent activity in the "Nix Language" room you mentioned is half nixpkgs anyway) | 20:02:13 | |
| I know some communities use channel channel1 channel2 channel3 channel4 channel5 They're all the same, except is splits the traffic for people having public discussions but can't follow along the one main channel | 20:04:26 | |
| One could argue that NixOS should implement Zulip or something that supports dynamic threads instead. The org can definitely host it 😄 | 20:05:03 | |
In reply to @lillecarl:matrix.orgsymys: It makes sense if you encourage public discussion, but the traffic is too high. Going private is "against FOSS" | 20:06:18 | |
In reply to @lillecarl:matrix.orgIntroducing another platform probably doesn't solve the Matrix problems, Discourse already exists. | 20:13:16 | |
In reply to @aloisw:kde.orgTrue, but #flakes:nixos.org is very seldom used. Yet it's an area of much activity, confusion, and controversy - a literalish divide that makes people feel like they need to specify whether they're using flakes or not all the time. | 20:22:44 | |
| (I do am currently trying to explore a bridging solution with Zulip with proper puppeteering, though I cannot act without explicit permission from the moderation team for any official room), | 20:23:18 | |
| (and it's not even sure that even if it's any good, this will be accepted) | 20:23:32 | |
In reply to @aloisw:kde.org* True, but #flakes:nixos.org is very seldom used. Yet it's an area of much activity, confusion, and controversy - a literalish divide that makes people feel like they need to specify whether they're using flakes or not all the time. But the room already exists! | 20:23:31 | |
| https://matrix.to/#/!uzGGsQXWXsuwIqJImY:nixos.org/$kyw_q6QBJUmNc-9lFO5BlBRmsw-oBusRiHvlxBdzu3g?via=matrix.org&via=nixos.dev&via=pixie.town for the moderation inquiries | 20:25:01 | |
In reply to @aloisw:kde.orgDeprecating one for another, matrix is pretty "bad" compared to centralised solutions (not fighting equal battles) | 20:25:52 | |
In reply to @raitobezarius:matrix.orgI can't view the message due to room permissions (I think). | 20:26:07 | |
In reply to @lillecarl:matrix.orgYou mean deprecating Matrix for Zulip? I don't know anything about Zulip yet, but that would probably be a very hard sell for me. | 20:27:13 | |