| 27 May 2025 |
Zhaofeng Li |
- Element X on iOS: 656
- Element Desktop: 661
- synadm: 657
| 02:25:51 |
Zhaofeng Li | makes sense, thank you matrix | 02:25:59 |
@saiko:knifepoint.net | also Emma [it/its] your room state thing with “show member events” on includes users who have left. is there a way to only see the ones who are actually in the room? | 02:26:31 |
@emma:rory.gay | there's not | 02:27:13 |
@saiko:knifepoint.net | In reply to @zhaofeng:zhaofeng.li
- Element X on iOS: 656
- Element Desktop: 661
- synadm: 657
when the homeserver can’t even agree with itself how many users it thinks are in the room | 02:27:14 |
@emma:rory.gay | its easier to just call the api yourself | 02:27:24 |
@emma:rory.gay | /_matrix/client/v3/rooms/:id/members?membership=join | 02:27:42 |
@saiko:knifepoint.net | ah nice, I’ll try that. tomorrow though, I really need to sleep lol | 02:28:12 |
Zhaofeng Li | *
- Element X on iOS: 656
- Element Desktop (Topic Bar): 656
- Element Desktop (Member List): 661
- synadm: 657
| 02:28:35 |
Zhaofeng Li | *
- Element X on iOS: 656
- Element Desktop (Top Bar): 656
- Element Desktop (Member List): 661
- synadm: 657
| 02:29:06 |
Zhaofeng Li | aha, I saw the inconsistency between the "top bar" (not sure what the name is) and the member list too, the one in the top bar matches Element X | 02:29:22 |
Zhaofeng Li | but still, 3 different numbers? | 02:29:38 |
@saiko:knifepoint.net | yeah, same here | 02:29:41 |
@saiko:knifepoint.net | very credible protocol | 02:30:43 |
| @stack:stackdoubleflow.net joined the room. | 04:16:38 |
@stack:stackdoubleflow.net | Can somebody invite me to the general nix/nixos help room, please? | 04:18:20 |
ggpeti | Wait, why do we need to be invited now? | 07:00:13 |
bandithedoge | In reply to @ggpeti:bassin.club Wait, why do we need to be invited now? spam attacks | 07:03:41 |
ggpeti | Makes sense. Sad that they achieved this | 07:04:18 |
ggpeti | Pls invite | 07:04:24 |
| Spore joined the room. | 07:32:23 |
Spore | Is the spamming that heavy right now? | 07:34:33 |
Cat | Yes the load is quite heavy | 07:37:59 |
uep | short answer: not in our rooms, because the largest are invite-only. But it's clearly still happening elsewhere based on the additions to the shared banlists we're getting from others | 07:38:25 |
Spore | Can we have different admin rules for different rooms? Removing all the image is affecting chat seriously in some other rooms moderated by the NixOS Moderation Bot | 07:38:29 |
Cat | In reply to @spore:mozilla.org Can we have different admin rules for different rooms? Removing all the image is affecting chat seriously in some other rooms moderated by the NixOS Moderation Bot Not possible with any of the 3 bots | 07:38:58 |
Cat | They would have to either switch to D4A or multi bot meowlnir or use a separate bot to achieve that effect | 07:39:38 |
uep | unfortunately, that's not feature of the bot.. we'd need to run 2 separate instances for different rooms with different policies. We might still wind up there, but it's a maintenance hassle we'd rather avoid | 07:39:42 |
| Irenes left the room. | 09:00:08 |
watersucks | Would like an invite to the NixOS general room, if possible. Thanks! | 09:00:59 |