| 24 May 2025 |
 emily | but I'm fine with anything | 11:45:09 |
| emily | (do we create "NixOS Zulip Discussion" on the Zulip? :p) | 11:46:49 |
 uep | t-matrix-shade | 11:47:18 |
|  ➡️@amadaluzia:unredacted.org changed their profile picture. | 13:39:09 |
 infinisil | emily: Hmm yeah I can't easily get an unused instance, and the instance we have is in use still (just for private conversations), but I think it's fine. Note also that even owners of the instance don't get access to private conversations and channels. | 14:09:55 |
| emily | hmm okay :P | 14:10:17 |
| emily | I'm not sure I'd be willing to hand out admin access to something being used for governance stuff myself, but not my judgement call to make. is the "easily" part just that it'd take reaching out to Zulip? | 14:10:43 |
| emily | (because maybe reaching out to them would be a good idea anyway, since we might get info/support about moving if we indicate we might be interested?) | 14:11:02 |
| infinisil | In reply to @emilazy:matrix.org
(because maybe reaching out to them would be a good idea anyway, since we might get info/support about moving if we indicate we might be interested?) Not sure what we'd need from them that we couldn't find out ourselves tbh | 14:43:39 |
| emily | well, if people are concerned about continuity then some kind of commitment around data exports might be useful I suppose | 14:51:11 |
| emily | (admittedly it would feel a little hopeless to ask about if there wasn't at least one Nixpkgs contributor there…) | 14:51:39 |
|  Jaoreir joined the room. | 15:40:47 |
|  @philt3r:mozilla.org joined the room. | 15:43:10 |
|  @mcnlty:matrix.org joined the room. | 16:28:44 |
| @mcnlty:matrix.org left the room. | 16:33:08 |
|  @neo_86:matrix.org joined the room. | 20:43:04 |
| @neo_86:matrix.org | I noticed the help channel doesnt exist any more? | 20:43:21 |
| @neo_86:matrix.org | anyone know where I can ask question about a package? I ran it and it was doing weird scans... | 20:43:53 |
 K900 | Do you mean the #users room? | 20:46:02 |
| K900 | I've sent you an invite | 20:46:07 |
| @neo_86:matrix.org | That is the one, I could not join it. | 20:46:42 |
| @neo_86:matrix.org | Thanks K900 | 20:46:45 |
|  Ekleog joined the room. | 21:08:23 |
 QuadRadical (Ping / Reply) | In reply to @neo_86:matrix.org
That is the one, I could not join it. there have been spam issues, that's why, it's current knock only | 21:16:21 |
| QuadRadical (Ping / Reply) | In reply to @neo_86:matrix.org
That is the one, I could not join it. * | 21:16:28 |
| Ekleog | Hey! I heard #users:nixos.org is now invite.only, can I get a spot? 😄 | 21:27:29 |
| Ekleog | And for my actual question, maybe here'd be fine too: I'm looking into https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/actions/runs/15231082040/job/42839007810?pr=385143 ; but there's literally not this string anywhere in my codebase when I ripgrep: there should always be at least a .nix after that even if all the variables . Is the test new and still wobbly, or is there some way of evaluating that i could reproduce that'd actually lead to that? | 21:29:36 |
| Ekleog | * And for my actual question, maybe here'd be fine too: I'm looking into https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/actions/runs/15231082040/job/42839007810?pr=385143 ; but there's literally not this string anywhere in my codebase when I ripgrep: there should always be at least a .nix after that even if all the variables were empty. Is the test new and still wobbly, or is there some way of evaluating that i could reproduce that'd actually lead to that? | 21:29:42 |
| Ekleog | Thank you SigmaSquadron 🎉 I'll re-ask my actual question there 😄 | 21:31:59 |
| @neo_86:matrix.org | Was this about people getting randomly invited to meeting rooms? I had 3 invites and blocked the person. | 23:06:49 |
