!GsmxjHfeAYLsTEQmjS:nixos.org

Matrix Meta (Nix)

608 Members
Discuss your proposals for the Matrix space here, before suggesting them in #matrix-suggestions:nixos.org171 Servers

You have reached the beginning of time (for this room).


SenderMessageTime
23 May 2025
@raboof:matrix.org@raboof:matrix.orgoh policy servers are at the 'room level'? then that's nice but doesn't help against invite spam at all?07:20:11
@beat_link:matrix.orgBeatLinkI think the only way to fix it is to implement better permission systems. Like for example, discord allows you to set who can create invite links, how long they are valid for and so on07:21:32
@beat_link:matrix.orgBeatLinkRight now, anyone in a room can invite anyone07:21:41
@emilazy:matrix.orgemilythat's not our issue at all07:25:10
@emilazy:matrix.orgemilywe have not had a single instance of anyone inviting a spammer with the rooms being invite-only07:25:27
@beat_link:matrix.orgBeatLinkoh07:25:37
@beat_link:matrix.orgBeatLinkim curious then, what is the main problem?07:25:50
@raboof:matrix.org@raboof:matrix.orgspammers inviting users to rooms with names containing slurs (and hinting that the room will contain illegal/offensive material like CSAM, though I haven't joined obv)07:27:13
@beat_link:matrix.orgBeatLinkohhhhhhhhhh07:27:57
@beat_link:matrix.orgBeatLinkoh no...07:28:03
@beat_link:matrix.orgBeatLinkthats...bad07:28:18
@raboof:matrix.org@raboof:matrix.orgright, and because the moderation tools are at the 'room level', but the invite is to a room controlled by the spammer, those moderation tools aren't effective against this.07:29:12
@beat_link:matrix.orgBeatLinkmakes sense07:29:30
@uep:matrix.orguepin addition to spamming the rooms with that horror, of course.07:37:07
@uep:matrix.orguep but yes, they're using invitations as the spam as well 07:37:24
@raboof:matrix.org@raboof:matrix.orgluckily I haven't seen the spam in the rooms, it sounded bad indeed... for that the current moderation tools are 'ok I suppose' though? and that policy server idea sounds like an improvement there.07:41:14
@beat_link:matrix.orgBeatLinki think policy servers could be a good thing. Kinda like bluesky's blocklists and similar to block lists used by ad blockers07:47:44
@beat_link:matrix.orgBeatLinkhaving a centralized database of bad stuff would offload some of the burdens of each server's moderators07:48:12
@beat_link:matrix.orgBeatLinkthe main problem i think would be who will be ponying up the time and manpower to populate said policy servers?07:48:41
@beat_link:matrix.orgBeatLinkive heard horror stories of facebook moderators seeing all kinds of horrible crap07:48:57
@uep:matrix.orguepthere are already reasonable mechanisms for publishing and sharing blocklists07:53:36
@uep:matrix.orguepand out bot shares (both inbound and outbound) with others07:54:21
@uep:matrix.orguepbut it doesn't apply to invites, and there's no real way for clients to use them, and the format is a bit limited so you can't use things like patterns for usernames07:55:40
@uep:matrix.orguepand all the other things, like deleting images, are reactive and subject to lag and the vagaries of matrix being inconsistent07:56:32

Show newer messages


Back to Room ListRoom Version: 6