!GsmxjHfeAYLsTEQmjS:nixos.org

Matrix Meta (Nix)

616 Members
Discuss your proposals for the Matrix space here, before suggesting them in #matrix-suggestions:nixos.org173 Servers

Load older messages


SenderMessageTime
11 Aug 2025
@ma27:nicht-so.sexyma27
In reply to @emma:rory.gay
element matthew isnt here... lol
too busy building a metaverse into matrix I heard
17:53:16
@emilazy:matrix.orgemilyis grapevine still a going concern?17:53:44
@aloisw:julia0815.de@aloisw:julia0815.de
In reply to @k900:0upti.me
Well the vuln seems to be "you can force well-behaved servers to roll back to any previous room state"
So their "availability at all costs" approach doesn't even give you availability, great.
17:54:03
@charles:computer.surgeryCharleswe're working on implementing room v12, it's just slow going17:54:08
@charles:computer.surgeryCharles* we're working on implementing room v12 in grapevine, it's just slow going17:54:20
@charles:computer.surgeryCharlesmotivation for this is very low as you might imagine17:54:31
@charles:computer.surgeryCharles* motivation for matrix work is very low as you might imagine17:54:38
@emilazy:matrix.orgemilyindeed17:54:42
@emilazy:matrix.orgemilyI was just curious17:54:44
@emilazy:matrix.orgemilyI've avoided the meme of setting up my own Matrix server for this long17:54:56
@charles:computer.surgeryCharlesgood call apparently lol17:55:28
@emilazy:matrix.orgemilyeveryone hates on matrix.org but the best way to dodge the problems of broken federated services is to just pick the flagship17:56:07
@emilazy:matrix.orgemilyadmittedly it has been very slow at times17:56:15
@aloisw:julia0815.de@aloisw:julia0815.deSome problems still remain, like the moderation one.17:57:35
@quadradical:federated.nexusQuadRadical (Ping)im still excited for polyproto, but maybe it won't be as good as i think idk17:57:50
@emilazy:matrix.orgemilywell, "dodge the problems that can be dodged by choice of instance", I suppose17:58:19
@emilazy:matrix.orgemilyif it dodged all the problems of Matrix I'd complain about it less17:58:32
@charles:computer.surgeryCharlesso... opening a NixOS/org issue like "consider replacing matrix with zulip" is the path forward here?18:00:31
@zhaofeng:zhaofeng.liZhaofeng Lithey are fixing it live it seems: https://github.com/element-hq/synapse/compare/v1.135.1...v1.135.218:01:04
@emilazy:matrix.orgemilyI think rather it was an issue for "hey give me access to the Zulip so I can test setting it up for NixOS project use / invite people (esp. mods) to play with it"18:01:16
@zhaofeng:zhaofeng.liZhaofeng Limaybe it will take another tag for the CI to pass? 😛18:01:18
@emilazy:matrix.orgemilywhoever would make the actual judgement call, I don't know; the SC has authority but I don't know if they'd want to be the ones to decide18:01:36
@emilazy:matrix.orgemilyif a substantial number of the people involved in operating the current Matrix setup (mod team, infra team) were in favour then I'm guessing the SC would be happy to sign off on it18:02:07
@charles:computer.surgeryCharlesmakes sense18:02:20
@emilazy:matrix.orgemilyperhaps with a public beta period or something18:02:25
@emilazy:matrix.orgemilyI have relatively little experience with Zulip, so you may already know everything you need to know from your own use18:02:43
@emilazy:matrix.orgemilybut I think moderation tooling is a big question18:02:48
@emilazy:matrix.orgemilyand I don't know the exact needs of the mod team in that regard18:02:56
@emilazy:matrix.orgemilyhmm does that ❌️ mean anything important? probably fine to tag the release anyway!18:04:06
@emilazy:matrix.orgemilycan always roll a .3!18:04:22

Show newer messages


Back to Room ListRoom Version: 6