!GsmxjHfeAYLsTEQmjS:nixos.org

Matrix Meta (Nix)

607 Members
Discuss your proposals for the Matrix space here, before suggesting them in #matrix-suggestions:nixos.org171 Servers

Load older messages


SenderMessageTime
18 Jul 2025
@emilazy:matrix.orgemily
In reply to @cat:feline.support
but yes its more centralised ofc but atleast your not completely offline just because someone is having maintennance.
I'm not sure you want availability when your Draupnir is down
18:07:12
@cat:feline.supportCatfair18:07:27
@emilazy:matrix.orgemilyit's kind of a pretty large target to paint on your rooms18:07:38
@charles:computer.surgeryCharlesyeah you got the right idea18:09:40
@emilazy:matrix.orgemilyultimately most communities do have centralized control. Matrix doesn't even serve the centralized decision-making case well because it's not like you can vote on mod actions without a central agent mediating that18:16:27
@emilazy:matrix.orgemily(ok I'm sure there's some big brained MSC for this)18:16:40
@gnu_ponut:matrix.orgGnuxie 💜🐝 policy servers are pretty close and a concession in the right direction 18:18:36
@gnu_ponut:matrix.orgGnuxie 💜🐝 problem is they fail open atm I think 18:18:54
@emilazy:matrix.orgemilyrighr18:19:12
@emilazy:matrix.orgemily * 18:19:16
@emilazy:matrix.orgemily if you're interested in other protocol designs like @charles:computer.surgery and accept that principle then I think you probably want to strip away a lot of Matrix complexity though 18:19:54
@emilazy:matrix.orgemilysince it just buys you much less at that point18:20:08
@gnu_ponut:matrix.orgGnuxie 💜🐝 it's true but that's not going to happen overnight 18:28:07
@emma:rory.gay@emma:rory.gayi dont like the idea of matrix being centralised but i do appreciate being at least somewhat able to cover the usecase via policy servers18:31:01
@emilazy:matrix.orgemily
In reply to @gnu_ponut:matrix.org
it's true but that's not going to happen overnight
oh for sure. I appreciate the work you put in
18:36:41
@emilazy:matrix.orgemilyI was only talking in the context of Charles expressing a desire for a differently-shaped protocol which I agree with18:37:11
@quadradical:federated.nexusQuadRadical (Ping)ive got my eye on polyproto19:16:47
@andiandi:tchncs.deandiandi 🐈 changed their display name from andiandi 🦆 to andiandi@hadr25.22:09:07
@andiandi:tchncs.deandiandi 🐈 changed their display name from andiandi@hadr25 to andiandi@hadr25 🏰🏞️.22:13:44
19 Jul 2025
@emma:rory.gay@emma:rory.gayi dont08:43:15
@quadradical:federated.nexusQuadRadical (Ping) why? 13:40:22
@charles:computer.surgeryCharlesgood question, the main things i see are that it repeats this mistake https://polyproto.org/docs/protocols/core#5-federation-ids-fids and also has a very discord model, whereas i think matrix's insight that everything can be modeled as different types of rooms was a good idea15:36:31
@quadradical:federated.nexusQuadRadical (Ping) i kind of agree with you about the discord thing, about repeating the mistake, what is the mistake there? 15:39:51
@charles:computer.surgeryCharleshuman-readable identifiers15:40:06
@charles:computer.surgeryCharlesconsider: trans people15:40:10
@quadradical:federated.nexusQuadRadical (Ping)huh15:40:25
@charles:computer.surgeryCharleschanging your FID will likely be a massive pain in the ass like it is on matrix15:40:43
@charles:computer.surgeryCharlesthis is bad15:40:48
@quadradical:federated.nexusQuadRadical (Ping)ah interesting15:40:49
@quadradical:federated.nexusQuadRadical (Ping)ill ask15:40:50

Show newer messages


Back to Room ListRoom Version: 6