| 18 Jul 2025 |
 Gnuxie 💜🐝 | problem is they fail open atm I think | 18:18:54 |
 emily | righr | 18:19:12 |
| emily | * | 18:19:16 |
| emily | if you're interested in other protocol designs like @charles:computer.surgery and accept that principle then I think you probably want to strip away a lot of Matrix complexity though | 18:19:54 |
| emily | since it just buys you much less at that point | 18:20:08 |
| Gnuxie 💜🐝 | it's true but that's not going to happen overnight | 18:28:07 |
 @emma:rory.gay | i dont like the idea of matrix being centralised but i do appreciate being at least somewhat able to cover the usecase via policy servers | 18:31:01 |
| emily | In reply to @gnu_ponut:matrix.org
it's true but that's not going to happen overnight oh for sure. I appreciate the work you put in | 18:36:41 |
| emily | I was only talking in the context of Charles expressing a desire for a differently-shaped protocol which I agree with | 18:37:11 |
 QuadRadical (Ping) @ FOSDEM | ive got my eye on polyproto | 19:16:47 |
|  andiandi 🐈 changed their display name from andiandi 🦆 to andiandi@hadr25. | 22:09:07 |
