!GsmxjHfeAYLsTEQmjS:nixos.org

Matrix Meta (Nix)

632 Members
Discuss your proposals for the Matrix space here, before suggesting them in #matrix-suggestions:nixos.org180 Servers

Load older messages


SenderMessageTime
24 May 2025
@xnefas:matrix.org@xnefas:matrix.orgHiya! Same as the others, need an invite to the new users room ::D06:43:15
@xnefas:matrix.org@xnefas:matrix.org left the room.07:55:25
@asshall:matrix.orgasshall joined the room.09:09:53
@asshall:matrix.orgasshallHi ! Pretty new to both matrix and nixos, makes me the kinda noob that doesn't even know how to find the proper channel to ask questions. Does anybody know if there is a channel for mobile-nixos ? Can't seem to find one...09:12:14
@uep:matrix.orguep you could try #nixos-on-arm:nixos.org perhaps. 09:13:24
@asshall:matrix.orgasshallCheers m8 !09:13:38
@emilazy:matrix.orgemilyhave we considered allowing images in invite-only rooms?09:35:50
@emilazy:matrix.orgemilywe haven't had any instances of spammers getting in there, right?09:35:56
@emilazy:matrix.orgemilythe open ones would still prohibit it ofc09:36:04
@uep:matrix.orguepthe problem is that mjolnir config is all or nothing09:36:16
@emilazy:matrix.orgemilyah.09:36:23
@cat:feline.supportCat
In reply to @emilazy:matrix.org
have we considered allowing images in invite-only rooms?
The bot is all or nothing and this isn’t even a Mjolnir unique flaw
09:36:49
@cat:feline.supportCat It’s all of them 09:36:56
@uep:matrix.orguep(afaik this doesn't change for draupnir either, I think that was one of the things I looked for as differences)09:37:15
@uep:matrix.orguepwe'd need to run 2 instances or something09:37:29
@uep:matrix.orguep
In reply to @emilazy:matrix.org
ah.
evergreen reaction
09:38:13
@emilazy:matrix.orgemilyI actually suddenly guessed that that was it right after sending my messages.09:38:31
@emilazy:matrix.orgemilythe Matrix-understanding neurons in my brain fired belatedly.09:38:43
@uep:matrix.orguepit's not even matrix specifically09:39:09
@uep:matrix.orguepthere's just no facility for room-specific policy in the protections09:40:21
@gnu_ponut:matrix.orgGnuxie πŸ’œπŸ that's right, you'll also find the protections aren't amazing either 09:44:31
@uep:matrix.orguep

At some point, we may end up with a setup that looks roughly like:

  • nixos protected rooms inside a space, available to space members only, with one set of bot protections from one bot
  • a "lobby" or other similar public room, where people can come to join the space, with more restrictive protections from another bot, and some way to get invited to the space after satisfying reasonable criteria
09:44:55
@uep:matrix.orguepbut.. ugh, there really should be a better way09:45:27
@uep:matrix.orguepand it's not even clear to me that this will work reasonably for users unless more clients support spaces09:45:50
@emilazy:matrix.orgemilydoes Draupnir support per-room plicy?09:46:07
@emilazy:matrix.orgemily* does Draupnir support per-room policy?09:46:08
@emilazy:matrix.orgemily oh, I guess Cat implied no 09:46:15
@gnu_ponut:matrix.orgGnuxie πŸ’œπŸ
In reply to @emilazy:matrix.org
does Draupnir support per-room plicy?
no
09:46:22
@uep:matrix.orguepnope.09:46:42
@gnu_ponut:matrix.orgGnuxie πŸ’œπŸ and it likely never will 09:46:52

Show newer messages


Back to Room ListRoom Version: 6