!GsmxjHfeAYLsTEQmjS:nixos.org

Matrix Meta (Nix)

655 Members
Discuss your proposals for the Matrix space here, before suggesting them in #matrix-suggestions:nixos.org187 Servers

Load older messages


SenderMessageTime
25 Jun 2021
@blaggacao:matrix.orgDavid Arnold (blaggacao) So what can we do right now? 03:16:27
@kity:kity.wtfash (it/its) 🏳️‍⚧️what the hell does "unstable" mean03:16:29
@kity:kity.wtfash (it/its) 🏳️‍⚧️right now?03:16:32
@kity:kity.wtfash (it/its) 🏳️‍⚧️we can remove flakes03:16:34
@kity:kity.wtfash (it/its) 🏳️‍⚧️just get rid of it03:16:44
@blaggacao:matrix.orgDavid Arnold (blaggacao)I guess pushing the URF (outside of an RFC) is not a bad option, especially the Super Stupid Flakes aspect of it03:16:57
@blaggacao:matrix.orgDavid Arnold (blaggacao)
In reply to @kity:kity.wtf
just get rid of it
We caan't do that pareto-efficiently
03:17:11
@blaggacao:matrix.orgDavid Arnold (blaggacao)
In reply to @kity:kity.wtf
just get rid of it
* We can't do that pareto-efficiently
03:17:24
@kity:kity.wtfash (it/its) 🏳️‍⚧️i see the URF as more bikeshedding on what flakes should be instead of what they shouldn't be (in nix)03:17:52
@kity:kity.wtfash (it/its) 🏳️‍⚧️it's not a serious proposal for how to move forward03:18:21
@kity:kity.wtfash (it/its) 🏳️‍⚧️it doesn't get anything done, it just proposes more options03:18:44
@kity:kity.wtfash (it/its) 🏳️‍⚧️and what we need is not more options03:18:49
@kity:kity.wtfash (it/its) 🏳️‍⚧️we need to make something happen03:18:55
@blaggacao:matrix.orgDavid Arnold (blaggacao)
In reply to @kity:kity.wtf
we need to make something happen
Can you code C++?
03:19:27
@blaggacao:matrix.orgDavid Arnold (blaggacao)I can't, and the URF is certainly not bikeshedding.03:19:54
@kity:kity.wtfash (it/its) 🏳️‍⚧️no, and last time i tried hacking on nix it didn't work out03:20:02
@kity:kity.wtfash (it/its) 🏳️‍⚧️i'm not gonna be the one to remove it from nix03:20:13
@kity:kity.wtfash (it/its) 🏳️‍⚧️but we can do better than more rfc talk03:20:25
@blaggacao:matrix.orgDavid Arnold (blaggacao)CitdelCore seems to transact upon it.03:20:51
@blaggacao:matrix.orgDavid Arnold (blaggacao)That's a good sing, after only 3 days03:20:57
@kity:kity.wtfash (it/its) 🏳️‍⚧️what is citadelcore03:21:06
@blaggacao:matrix.orgDavid Arnold (blaggacao)Who!03:21:11
@blaggacao:matrix.orgDavid Arnold (blaggacao)
In reply to @blaggacao:matrix.org
There is already some work consolidating around the input stuff here: https://github.com/NixOS/nix/pull/4641
This PR and discussion
03:21:43
@kity:kity.wtfash (it/its) 🏳️‍⚧️who is citadelcore03:21:43
@blaggacao:matrix.orgDavid Arnold (blaggacao) I think we need to fix flake input semantics, first. and completely get rid of output contracts. 03:22:22
@blaggacao:matrix.orgDavid Arnold (blaggacao)(the way they are today)03:22:30
@blaggacao:matrix.orgDavid Arnold (blaggacao)Getting rid of output contracts also get's rid of the cli tooling consumer of it.03:22:42
@blaggacao:matrix.orgDavid Arnold (blaggacao) ... gets rid of nix flake in good part 03:22:51
@blaggacao:matrix.orgDavid Arnold (blaggacao) * ... gets rid of nix flake in some part 03:23:11
@kity:kity.wtfash (it/its) 🏳️‍⚧️and is that supposed to be a step towards fixing flakes or removing them?03:23:24

Show newer messages


Back to Room ListRoom Version: 6