| 25 Jun 2021 |
 David Arnold | I also think we should revert the outputs schema and let it grow via a separate RFC-like process or provide outputs.name.__contract semantics, where the tooling can consume the contract and validate against it | 03:06:36 |
| David Arnold | And we should refine the inputs semantics | 03:07:04 |
 ash | i don't care what happens to flakes, i just want it gone so it stops being an impediment to the healthy ecosystem | 03:07:22 |
| David Arnold | In reply to @kity:kity.wtf
i don't care what happens to flakes, i just want it gone so it stops being an impediment to the healthy ecosystem Nah... that stance needs still a little work, I'd guess. | 03:07:57 |
| David Arnold | There is already some work consolidating around the input stuff here: https://github.com/NixOS/nix/pull/4641 | 03:08:13 |
| ash | no it doesn't. flakes can come back when it's ready. | 03:08:20 |
| David Arnold | In reply to @kity:kity.wtf
no it doesn't. flakes can come back when it's ready. Make a distionction | 03:08:32 |
| David Arnold | In reply to @kity:kity.wtf
no it doesn't. flakes can come back when it's ready. * Make a distinction | 03:08:39 |
| David Arnold | ... where it's approriate. | 03:08:45 |
| David Arnold | flake vs nix 3.0 | 03:08:50 |
