| 25 Jun 2021 |
 David Arnold | you can edit the docs... | 03:02:08 |
| David Arnold | I'd suggest a section about getting rid of nix 3.0 flake entangelement | 03:02:25 |
| David Arnold | It already says:
a highly contested item (“solve everything at once”)
| 03:03:06 |
| David Arnold | I think that's the pass for you to score your point | 03:03:26 |
| David Arnold | (or the point) | 03:03:38 |
| David Arnold | https://demo.hedgedoc.org/uyQYTpTVQbyvpdcJ6MvlQg?both# | 03:03:51 |
| David Arnold | (edit link) | 03:03:55 |
 ash | and where is this unofficial roadmap being pushed? | 03:03:59 |
| ash | this is the first time i've seen it | 03:04:12 |
| David Arnold | In reply to @kity:kity.wtf
and where is this unofficial roadmap being pushed? It's going viral 🤣 | 03:04:19 |
| David Arnold | In reply to @kity:kity.wtf
this is the first time i've seen it I'ts 2 days old or so | 03:04:32 |
| David Arnold | But Elco has already had the chance to have a peak at it | 03:04:45 |
| David Arnold | In reply to @kity:kity.wtf
this is the first time i've seen it * It's 2 days old or so | 03:04:58 |
| David Arnold | But yeah, it laks a point about `nix 3.0 entablement (or disentaglement) | 03:05:24 |
| David Arnold | * But yeah, it laks a point about nix 3.0 entanglement (or disentaglement) | 03:05:32 |
| David Arnold | * But yeah, it lacks a point about nix 3.0 entanglement (or disentaglement) | 03:05:37 |
| David Arnold | * But yeah, it lacks a point about nix 3.0 entanglement (or disentaglement) | 03:05:46 |
| David Arnold | I also think we should revert the outputs schema and let it grow via a separate RFC-like process or provide outputs.name.__contract semantics, where the tooling can consume the contract and validate against it | 03:06:36 |
| David Arnold | And we should refine the inputs semantics | 03:07:04 |
| ash | i don't care what happens to flakes, i just want it gone so it stops being an impediment to the healthy ecosystem | 03:07:22 |
| David Arnold | In reply to @kity:kity.wtf
i don't care what happens to flakes, i just want it gone so it stops being an impediment to the healthy ecosystem Nah... that stance needs still a little work, I'd guess. | 03:07:57 |
| David Arnold | There is already some work consolidating around the input stuff here: https://github.com/NixOS/nix/pull/4641 | 03:08:13 |
| ash | no it doesn't. flakes can come back when it's ready. | 03:08:20 |
| David Arnold | In reply to @kity:kity.wtf
no it doesn't. flakes can come back when it's ready. Make a distionction | 03:08:32 |
| David Arnold | In reply to @kity:kity.wtf
no it doesn't. flakes can come back when it's ready. * Make a distinction | 03:08:39 |
| David Arnold | ... where it's approriate. | 03:08:45 |
| David Arnold | flake vs nix 3.0 | 03:08:50 |
| David Arnold | or nix flake | 03:08:56 |
| David Arnold | vs flake.nix | 03:09:00 |
| ash | flakes should never have been introduced to nix unstable in the first place | 03:09:22 |
