| 31 Oct 2023 |
 K900 | Possibly? | 15:28:30 |
 @rikudou:lemmings.world | In reply to @atemu12:matrix.org
That's what you need to Google and see whether MSI offers downloads They do, they offer some file and an exe tool for flashing it | 15:28:34 |
| K900 | At least that's what Google says | 15:28:35 |
| K900 | In reply to@rikudou:lemmings.world
They do, they offer some file and an exe tool for flashing it If the file is just a 16MB/32MB blob, it's probably flashable from the BIOS setup menu itsefl | 15:28:53 |
| K900 | * If the file is just a 16MB/32MB blob, it's probably flashable from the BIOS setup menu itself | 15:28:55 |
 @atemu12:matrix.org | You're in Luck, it seems like they do offer a download | 15:29:11 |
| @atemu12:matrix.org | Now to hope the BIOS lets you flash | 15:29:21 |
| @atemu12:matrix.org | Because why would you do that? You'd obvious use our amazing flashing util on your favourite OS Windows | 15:29:46 |
| @rikudou:lemmings.world | I've already downloaded, I'm just not sure how to do it, they don't provide any instructions | 15:30:07 |
| @atemu12:matrix.org | Put it onto an MBR FAT32 USB and boot into UEFI | 15:30:30 |
| @rikudou:lemmings.world | I've downloaded this: https://www.msi.com/Laptop/Prestige-16-A12UD/support
The first file with E1592IMS.10F as a version | 15:30:31 |
| K900 | Look for stuff that says "flash" or "update" in the BIOS | 15:31:06 |
| @rikudou:lemmings.world | Will do, just have to find some USB stick lying around, thanks for your help so far! | 15:31:38 |
|  @zhenbo:matrix.org left the room. | 18:03:53 |
| 1 Nov 2023 |
|  arcayr joined the room. | 07:33:50 |
|  @djrmarques:matrix.org joined the room. | 09:37:28 |
| 2 Nov 2023 |
 @tejing:matrix.org | jonringer: Hey, as steam maintainer, can you give me an idea if you'd be for or against implementing a workaround for https://github.com/ValveSoftware/steam-for-linux/issues/9121#issuecomment-1483689592 in our steam packaging, at the cost of making https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/issues/160923 worse? (Basically just giving steam its own /tmp so it can't step on anyone else's toes) | 00:44:45 |
|  jenital changed their profile picture. | 02:57:16 |
| K900 | In reply to @tejing:matrix.org
jonringer: Hey, as steam maintainer, can you give me an idea if you'd be for or against implementing a workaround for https://github.com/ValveSoftware/steam-for-linux/issues/9121#issuecomment-1483689592 in our steam packaging, at the cost of making https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/issues/160923 worse? (Basically just giving steam its own /tmp so it can't step on anyone else's toes) I actually think /tmp per fhsenv might be a good idea in general | 05:28:36 |
| K900 | But maybe after 23.11 | 05:28:43 |
 jonringer | I wonder if we can just creat a tmpfs for /tmp | 05:54:28 |
| jonringer | post 23.11 branch might be best.... only 2-3 weeks away | 05:56:58 |
 @elvishjerricco:matrix.org | isn't there stuff in /tmp for X11 that would have to get bind mounted in or something? | 05:58:14 |
 @vcunat:matrix.org | I'd generally expect such things in (/var)/run instead. | 06:07:57 |
| K900 | In reply to@elvishjerricco:matrix.org
isn't there stuff in /tmp for X11 that would have to get bind mounted in or something? There is but we bind-mount it explicitly already | 06:09:47 |
|  diamondburned changed their profile picture. | 08:55:20 |
| diamondburned changed their profile picture. | 08:56:40 |
| @tejing:matrix.org | In reply to @jonringer:matrix.org
I wonder if we can just creat a tmpfs for /tmp Maybe, but it might cause problems if every individual thing run with steam-run had a separate /tmp from one another. Not sure. But yeah, waiting till after 23.11 makes sense. Sounds like you're for it, generally, though. | 12:58:51 |
|  @mildras:one.ems.host joined the room. | 16:48:48 |
| K900 | https://opengoal.dev/blog/progress-report-oct-2023/ | 17:05:49 |
