| 27 Feb 2024 |
 hexa | https://overkill.wtf/nintendo-sue-yuzu-emulator/ | 22:13:13 |
 @aktaboot:tchncs.de | Anyone has experienced weird behaviour when mouse goes on screen border in fullscreen ? | 22:45:40 |
| @aktaboot:tchncs.de | e.g when trying to move the camera, it stutters and sometimes moves in other directions | 22:46:17 |
| 28 Feb 2024 |
 skalpasi | In reply to @aktaboot:tchncs.de
Anyone has experienced weird behaviour when mouse goes on screen border in fullscreen ? Which game? | 02:37:15 |
| 27 Feb 2024 |
|  Nebula changed their profile picture. | 23:52:14 |
| 28 Feb 2024 |
 @sigmasquadron:matrix.org | In reply to @hexa:lossy.network
https://overkill.wtf/nintendo-sue-yuzu-emulator/ and another win for open source | 02:58:08 |
| @sigmasquadron:matrix.org | you can’t ban a freely distributed project | 02:58:21 |
 @delroth:delroth.net | In reply to @sigmasquadron:matrix.org
you can’t ban a freely distributed project not a particularly useful property if you can de facto ban its development | 03:54:36 |
 @elvishjerricco:matrix.org |
The copyright infringement filing, from Nintendo of America, states that the Yuzu tool (from developer Tropic Haze LLC) illegally circumvents the software encryption and copyright protection systems of Nintendo Switch titles, and thus facilitates piracy and infringes copyright under the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA).
I think it depends on this. If yuzu is removing DRM, that's definitely illegal. If not, emulators as a whole are probably legal but not entirely clearly. IANAL but that's my understanding.
| 05:17:08 |
| @elvishjerricco:matrix.org | *
The copyright infringement filing, from Nintendo of America, states that the Yuzu tool (from developer Tropic Haze LLC) illegally circumvents the software encryption and copyright protection systems of Nintendo Switch titles, and thus facilitates piracy and infringes copyright under the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA).
I think it depends on this. In the US, if yuzu is removing DRM, that's definitely illegal. If not, emulators as a whole are probably legal but not entirely clearly. IANAL but that's my understanding.
| 05:17:28 |
| @elvishjerricco:matrix.org | And even if you can't stop people from doing illegal things, you sure can crack down on and crush the individuals doing the bulk of the legwork | 05:18:11 |
|  sturmfahrt45 joined the room. | 06:25:31 |
|  @platonic69:matrix.org joined the room. | 06:59:07 |
|  @nuko:shimeji.cafe changed their profile picture. | 10:05:17 |
|  MH changed their display name from The Conjurer to MH. | 11:02:32 |
|  haruki7049 joined the room. | 12:45:15 |
 @antheww:matrix.rattlesnake.fr | In reply to @hexa:lossy.network
https://overkill.wtf/nintendo-sue-yuzu-emulator/ Nintendo being douchebags once again | 13:02:08 |
| hexa | not the worst thing they have done | 13:02:31 |
| @antheww:matrix.rattlesnake.fr | True 😅 | 13:03:08 |
 @sr.estegosaurio:matrix.org | I really hope they loose. | 13:43:34 |
| @sr.estegosaurio:matrix.org | They complete jerks when it comes to copyright. | 13:46:24 |
| @elvishjerricco:matrix.org | well, again, I really think it's just going to come down to whether yuzu is actually doing drm removal. Because that's blatantly illegal in the US, and that's what they're accusing them of. If they're not, it should be a nothing-suit. Albeit one that could cost a lot of money for someone | 14:10:46 |
|  Yvan Sraka (old) left the room. | 15:45:19 |
| Nebula | someone will fork it and release it under a new name anyway | 14:31:21 |
| @delroth:delroth.net | In reply to @elvishjerricco:matrix.org
The copyright infringement filing, from Nintendo of America, states that the Yuzu tool (from developer Tropic Haze LLC) illegally circumvents the software encryption and copyright protection systems of Nintendo Switch titles, and thus facilitates piracy and infringes copyright under the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA).
I think it depends on this. In the US, if yuzu is removing DRM, that's definitely illegal. If not, emulators as a whole are probably legal but not entirely clearly. IANAL but that's my understanding.
every emulator for any console more recent than the Nintendo GameCube is "removing DRM" for some definition of "removing DRM", the problem is there's on precedent for how broad "removing DRM" should be and the law is written in the broadest of way with the expectation that the Librarian of Congress sets reasonable expectations | 15:57:49 |
| Nebula | it'll be an endless cycle | 14:31:33 |
| @delroth:delroth.net | In reply to @elvishjerricco:matrix.org
The copyright infringement filing, from Nintendo of America, states that the Yuzu tool (from developer Tropic Haze LLC) illegally circumvents the software encryption and copyright protection systems of Nintendo Switch titles, and thus facilitates piracy and infringes copyright under the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA).
I think it depends on this. In the US, if yuzu is removing DRM, that's definitely illegal. If not, emulators as a whole are probably legal but not entirely clearly. IANAL but that's my understanding.
* every emulator for any console more recent than the Nintendo GameCube is "removing DRM" for some definition of "removing DRM", the problem is there's no precedent for how broad "removing DRM" should be and the law is written in the broadest of way with the expectation that the Librarian of Congress sets reasonable expectations | 15:57:57 |
| Nebula | yuzu gets dmca'd -> new emulator based on yuzu pops up -> get's dmcad | 14:32:23 |
| @delroth:delroth.net | * every emulator for any console more recent than the Nintendo GameCube is "removing DRM" for some definition of "removing DRM", the problem is there's no precedent for how broad "removing DRM" should be and the law is written in the broadest of way with the expectation that the Librarian of Congress sets reasonable exceptions | 15:58:01 |
| @delroth:delroth.net | so no, drm removal is not "blatantly illegal", in fact https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2021/10/28/2021-23311/exemption-to-prohibition-on-circumvention-of-copyright-protection-systems-for-access-control lists a bunch of cases where it's specifically allowed, these cases don't include emulation, probably because nobody petitioned the Library of Congress to try and make that call | 15:59:30 |
