| 22 Feb 2024 |
 K900 | But it is still usable | 16:12:06 |
| K900 | Mostly | 16:12:17 |
 @sr.estegosaurio:matrix.org | I guess that since both the module and KDE6 are not yet released I should follow the most up to date branch which in this case is the PR. | 16:13:15 |
| K900 | You could also just point your nixpkgs at the PR branch | 16:12:33 |
| K900 | I rebased it earlier today so now it's mostly up to date on the rest of nixpkgs | 16:12:48 |
| @sr.estegosaurio:matrix.org | The only pain point it's going to be having to:
- Build it.
- Persist the required files.
| 16:13:59 |
| K900 | The changes between kde2nix and the PR are mostly in the packaging itself | 16:13:39 |
| K900 | They're both built from the same upstream source code, which is currently 6.0-rc2 | 16:13:55 |
| K900 | A final 6.0 release is planned for the 28th | 16:14:14 |
| K900 | So it's unlikely there will be any more big rebuilds | 16:14:25 |
| @sr.estegosaurio:matrix.org | In reply to @k900:0upti.me
But if you do that there's a NixOS option, yes Do you recommend me doing that or just poiting my nixpkgs to the PR branch? | 16:14:58 |
| K900 | Until that happens and then I'll probably just merge the PR | 16:14:37 |
| K900 | So it'll get built by Hydra in a few days | 16:14:50 |
| K900 | I mean, I do not trust myself to track unstable with that branch | 16:15:33 |
| @sr.estegosaurio:matrix.org | I'm gonna make my laptop suffer building this. :D | 16:16:12 |
| K900 | So if you have your own nixpkgs fork already, or some other convenient way to apply patches, it's a better idea to do that | 16:15:50 |
| K900 | But if you don't, you should be able to just point it at k900/nixpkgs/plasma-6 and it should be fine | 16:16:12 |
| @sr.estegosaurio:matrix.org | In reply to @k900:0upti.me
So if you have your own nixpkgs fork already, or some other convenient way to apply patches, it's a better idea to do that A convinient way to apply unmerged patches definetly sounds like something very handy. | 16:17:52 |
| K900 | Also we should probably take this conversation to #NixOS KDE | 16:18:22 |
| K900 | Because it is getting extremely offtopic for this room | 16:18:31 |
| @sr.estegosaurio:matrix.org | In reply to @k900:0upti.me
But if you don't, you should be able to just point it at k900/nixpkgs/plasma-6 and it should be fine I'm going to do that at the time being but I want to look further in what you mentioned first. | 16:18:37 |
| 23 Feb 2024 |
|  Shane on Conduit.rs ⚡️ and Fractal 🦀️ changed their profile picture. | 03:28:32 |
| 22 Feb 2024 |
| @sr.estegosaurio:matrix.org | Yeah... Mb. | 16:19:06 |
|  @grantorinowhiskey:matrix.org joined the room. | 21:26:58 |
| 23 Feb 2024 |
|  @nuko:shimeji.cafe changed their display name from fishiesion kitty to nyaa fishiesion kittuwuy. | 07:19:39 |
| @nuko:shimeji.cafe changed their display name from nyaa fishiesion kittuwuy to ₒₓ⋆:°* nyaa fishiesion kittuwuy *°:⋆ₓₒ. | 07:34:26 |
| @nuko:shimeji.cafe changed their display name from ₒₓ⋆:°* nyaa fishiesion kittuwuy *°:⋆ₓₒ to ><> ₒₓ⋆:°* nyaa fishiesion kittuwuy *°:⋆ₓₒ ><>. | 07:37:21 |
 @atka:matrix.org | helping a friend w/ steam+gamescope on nixos, they can't appear to set fsr resolution with steam game launch options, is this supported? they have programs.steam.enabled and programs.gamescope.enable set to true. | 08:08:40 |
| K900 | There's no graphical option for it I'm pretty sure? | 08:10:15 |
| K900 | You just need to set the resolution in the game itself and Gamescope will upscale it | 08:10:30 |
