| 16 Feb 2024 |
 @atemu12:matrix.org | But it does not promise any separation | 20:25:30 |
| @atemu12:matrix.org | Why not Flatpak though? | 20:25:45 |
| @atemu12:matrix.org | That's one of it's purposes | 20:26:04 |
 @atka:matrix.org | I just wanted to do it a more "nixos" way, I figured there would be a nixos-container or bubblewrap way without using flatpak | 20:28:24 |
| @atka:matrix.org | I like having my system managed by my single configuration.nix (can flatpaks be declared that way?) | 20:29:04 |
| @atka:matrix.org | maybe I'm mistaken though, I can do flatpak if I have to, or just keep my work computer separate like I've been doing and game solely on the deck | 20:33:44 |
| @atka:matrix.org | if I do go the flatpak route this may be useful | 20:36:32 |
| @atka:matrix.org | https://github.com/GermanBread/declarative-flatpak | 20:36:34 |
|  @multisn8-idk:matrix.org changed their display name from multisn8 to multisn8 (migrated to without the -idk). | 21:49:27 |
| @multisn8-idk:matrix.org changed their display name from multisn8 (migrated to without the -idk) to multisn8-idk (migrated to without the -idk). | 21:50:22 |
|  @multisn8:matrix.org joined the room. | 22:04:44 |
| @multisn8-idk:matrix.org left the room. | 22:07:04 |
| 17 Feb 2024 |
 @aidalgol:matrix.org | You could override the steam derivation to pass extra arguments to buildFHSEnv, which uses bwrap, to harden the sandboxing. | 00:44:49 |
| @aidalgol:matrix.org | bwrap is the same thing flatpak uses, btw. | 00:45:01 |
| @atka:matrix.org | thanks, that's more in line what I'm looking for | 00:48:17 |
