| 31 Oct 2023 |
 Foxboron | The ISO targets are nice goals though :) | 13:28:50 |
 raitobezarius | Once we are there, we can start looking at the rest of the observable universe :P | 13:28:53 |
| raitobezarius | I think we need the "Archlinux goal" | 13:29:02 |
| raitobezarius | Or the Guix goal | 13:29:05 |
| raitobezarius | After that, it will be a new type of discussion of "what does it mean to pursue a reproducibility goal for nixpkgs?" | 13:29:18 |
 Julien | debian has really good numbers | 13:29:20 |
| raitobezarius | Any project having a good Reproducible Builds team, I guess :P | 13:29:41 |
| Foxboron | You'll also have inflated numbers because you deal with "paths" and repackage ecosystems. | 13:29:49 |
| raitobezarius | The Repology statistics doesn't include them AFAIK | 13:30:05 |
| Foxboron | In reply to @julienmalka:matrix.org
debian has really good numbers The numbers you are looking at are not real reproductions, fyi | 13:30:05 |
| raitobezarius | I mean | 13:30:07 |
| raitobezarius | Include repackaged ecosystems | 13:30:10 |
| raitobezarius | Yes | 13:30:11 |
| raitobezarius | Not the "paths" though | 13:30:16 |
| raitobezarius | There are too many ways to count what is the artifacts output size of nixpkgs | 13:30:31 |
 atemu12 | In reply to @raitobezarius:matrix.org
Include repackaged ecosystems It does. | 13:30:33 |
| raitobezarius | In reply to @atemu12:matrix.org
It does. Yes yes, I clarified it does include repackaged ecosystems but not the "paths" | 13:30:46 |
| raitobezarius | I think it's fair to include repackaged ecosystems though | 13:30:54 |
| raitobezarius | AUR does have python3-XYZ | 13:30:59 |
| raitobezarius | For many XYZ | 13:31:01 |
| raitobezarius | Debian doesn't and… this means that people have to pursue them somewhere else | 13:31:14 |
| Foxboron | The repro count you are operating with uses "paths" which confuses people :) | 13:31:20 |
| raitobezarius | * Debian doesn't and… this means that people have to pursue them somewhere else (beyond basics) | 13:31:21 |
| raitobezarius | In reply to @foxboron:archlinux.org
The repro count you are operating with uses "paths" which confuses people :) Ah! The repro yes | 13:31:33 |
| raitobezarius | I thought we were talking about repology | 13:31:40 |
| Foxboron | Ah no, I don't care too much about repology stats :p | 13:32:02 |
| raitobezarius | :D | 13:32:22 |
| raitobezarius | I mean, either case, we probably need a way to map nixpkgs stuff to Arch/Debian/Guix so we can also do comparisons | 13:32:39 |
| Foxboron | It would be useful, I think | 13:33:13 |
| atemu12 | I think repology could come in handy there as it's also a map of packages between repos | 13:33:43 |
