| 27 Dec 2022 |
|  auk joined the room. | 21:31:54 |
| 28 Dec 2022 |
 @jcmdln:matrix.org | Are there automated tests for reproducing all Nix packages, or would I be correct in assuming that the focus is specifically for the packages included in the minimal iso? Out of curiosity I tried reproducing a few packages like postfix which is non-deterministic but I'm not sure if it should be reported. | 16:28:19 |
 @trofi:matrix.org | I'd say all the packages should be reproducible and it's worth reporting any non-determinism. | 16:30:11 |
 @rick:matrix.ciphernetics.nl | Yes | 16:36:48 |
| @rick:matrix.ciphernetics.nl | Ideally with a report of diffoscope attached and the tag reproducible builds | 16:37:10 |
 raboof | basically everything you might want to fetch from a binary cache is worth having reproducible - so indeed that's pretty much all packages. The build closure of the minimal iso is a bit of an arbitrary milestone, it'd be nice if we could make some more reports :) | 16:48:02 |
| @rick:matrix.ciphernetics.nl | Gnome iso is also useful, I guess | 17:00:51 |
| @rick:matrix.ciphernetics.nl | But yeah, would be nice indeed | 17:00:58 |
| 1 Jan 2023 |
|  @v0id:nltrix.net left the room. | 12:05:02 |
