| 1 Jan 2025 |
|  NixOS Moderation Botchanged room power levels. | 14:26:26 |
|  jopejoe1 (4094@39c3) changed their display name from jopejoe1 [4094] to jopejoe1. | 23:30:14 |
| 3 Jan 2025 |
|  elikoga changed their display name from elikoga (@38c3 📞488{0,1,9}) to elikoga. | 10:28:01 |
| 4 Jan 2025 |
|  @kranzes:matrix.org left the room. | 15:31:06 |
| 6 Jan 2025 |
 emily | "You can try the new experimental -fobject-determinism flag to enable deterministic object code generation." https://blog.haskell.org/ghc-9-12-cabal-3-14/ 👀 | 23:24:56 |
| 7 Jan 2025 |
 Pol | https://salsa.debian.org/reproducible-builds/reproducible-website/-/commit/1179e9457bf7280f1954a33b6505cc6bdff33442 | 07:47:41 |
| Pol | Thanks for the heads up | 07:47:50 |
|  Fernando Rodrigues changed their display name from SigmaSquadron to SigmaSquadron (Away until 2024-01-12). | 19:35:57 |
| 9 Jan 2025 |
| Pol | It is published: https://reproducible-builds.org/reports/2024-12/#other-development-news | 12:13:55 |
| 10 Jan 2025 |
| Fernando Rodrigues changed their display name from SigmaSquadron (Away until 2024-01-12) to SigmaSquadron (Away until 2024-01-11). | 22:15:46 |
| Fernando Rodrigues changed their display name from SigmaSquadron (Away until 2024-01-11) to SigmaSquadron (Away until 2025-01-11). | 22:43:19 |
| 11 Jan 2025 |
|  @orzklv:matrix.org left the room. | 04:07:35 |
|  dgrig joined the room. | 07:49:50 |
| Fernando Rodrigues changed their display name from SigmaSquadron (Away until 2025-01-11) to SigmaSquadron. | 15:06:40 |
|  pandapip1 joined the room. | 21:22:18 |
| 12 Jan 2025 |
|  @strutztm:strutztm.de joined the room. | 00:23:59 |
| 15 Jan 2025 |
|  SomeoneSerge (back on matrix) changed their display name from SomeoneSerge (utc+3) to SomeoneSerge. | 19:01:46 |
| 18 Jan 2025 |
|  sunny.nc joined the room. | 12:48:54 |
| 19 Jan 2025 |
|  Reventlov left the room. | 09:36:52 |
| 25 Jan 2025 |
|  @mlieberman85:matrix.org left the room. | 04:30:18 |
| 27 Jan 2025 |
 Julien | Hello, shameless plug: I have written a research paper (and a blog post) about the bitwise reproducibility levels in nixpkgs -> https://luj.fr/blog/is-nixos-truly-reproducible.html | 14:49:38 |
| Julien | The paper is here: https://hal.science/hal-04913007 | 14:50:29 |
 Martin Schwaighofer | Congrats! I read the post and upvoted it on HN, will read the paper in the following days. 😊 | 15:35:49 |
| Martin Schwaighofer | * Congrats! I read the post and upvoted it on HN. It's a great post. Will read the paper in the following days. 😊 | 15:36:24 |
 linj | How do you treat FODs, such as source codes of packages, in your experiment? Are they substituted from cache.nixos.org or built locally? Are they treated like other packages when classified into reproducible, rebuildable and non-rebuildable? I skimmed through your blog post and paper but did not find this information. | 16:18:36 |
| Julien | we did not rebuild the FODs | 16:19:24 |
| Julien | They were substituted from the cache | 16:19:40 |
| Julien | And did not count in the statistics | 16:19:49 |
 atemu12 | FODs aren't really interesting from a r13y standpoint; they are bit-reproducible by definition. | 16:20:28 |
| atemu12 | Their primary issue is source availability | 16:20:42 |
