| 20 Jun 2021 |
|  makefu joined the room. | 18:33:34 |
|  balsoft joined the room. | 19:26:48 |
| balsoft | Just wanted to jump in and congratulate you on your fantastic work! | 19:27:39 |
| balsoft left the room. | 19:27:49 |
|  emily joined the room. | 20:38:55 |
| emily | congrats on... um, 99.88% :) | 20:39:16 |
 Rick (Mindavi) | The website is a little behind but I heard rumors about 100% | 20:52:21 |
| emily | seems more like a regression? https://discourse.nixos.org/t/nixos-unstable-s-iso-minimal-x86-64-linux-is-100-reproducible/13723 has an archived 100% | 21:39:29 |
| emily | oh hm | 21:39:46 |
| emily | the generation timestamp on r13y.com is older than that archived version | 21:39:56 |
| emily | so I guess it's some caching issue | 21:40:00 |
 hexa | https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=27573393 | 21:52:46 |
| hexa | and trending | 21:52:48 |
 tomberek | Did it happen?! | 22:03:41 |
 @grahamc:nixos.org | congratulations everyone, this is fantastic! | 23:23:22 |
| emily | that taviso comment just straight up assumes that everyone gets their binary software builds straight from the source code vendor :( | 23:56:47 |
| emily | another criticism of reproducible builds I encountered today was "this is useless... you have to pin all your dependencies!" >_>; | 23:59:47 |
| 21 Jun 2021 |
| @grahamc:nixos.org | don't worry about it :) it is great to see some people be grumpy about the good work we're doing | 01:02:43 |
| hexa | heh, taviso has been downvoted | 01:07:05 |
| hexa | his post is essentially dead | 01:07:30 |
| @grahamc:nixos.org | if I'd known we'd see such response to hitting 100% I'd have thought more carefully about the text at the bottom, and how to refer to the rest of the ecosystem and the fact that we're benefiting a lot from the ecosystem | 01:17:37 |
| @grahamc:nixos.org | any suggested text on how to communicate this? | 01:20:24 |
 siraben | In reply to @hexa:lossy.network
and trending YAY | 01:22:25 |
 chreekat | In reply to @grahamc:nixos.org
any suggested text on how to communicate this? A short history of the effort? | 01:24:33 |
 Xe (xe/they) | what compiler bundle does nixos use as the root of the reproducibility effort? | 01:29:59 |
| hexa | you mean what's in stdenv(.cc)? | 01:30:39 |
| hexa | ❯ nix-build -A stdenv.cc
/nix/store/gg2rq3hrl3rf92nq6dnqhdyyxaa89aqf-gcc-wrapper-10.3.0
| 01:31:07 |
| Xe (xe/they) | is that c compiler used to rebuild itself? | 01:34:24 |
| @grahamc:nixos.org | that is already a post-bootstrapping gcc | 01:35:12 |
| Xe (xe/they) | oh, what's the bootstrapping root then? | 01:35:38 |
