| 20 May 2023 |
 @rnhmjoj:maxwell.ydns.eu | In reply to @delroth:delroth.net
only slightly related but I wonder if we really need Python in the minimal ISO... it's used by a few ZFS user scripts that are probably seldom used and definitely not needed for mounting/recovery (e.g. arc_summary), it's used by smb2-quota (similar story), and the rest seems to all be derivations that have Python bindings in their main output when it could be a separate output python is needed for the systed-boot install script, so you're probably going to fetch it anyway | 10:23:33 |
| @rnhmjoj:maxwell.ydns.eu | * python is needed for the systemd-boot install script, so you're probably going to fetch it anyway | 16:53:59 |
 raitobezarius | but soon we can remove it | 17:02:11 |
| raitobezarius | once we refactor the bootloader installation story | 17:02:29 |
| @rnhmjoj:maxwell.ydns.eu | what are you rewriting it into? I hope not perl | 18:37:49 |
| raitobezarius | https://github.com/nix-community/lanzaboote/tree/master/rust/tool/src | 18:38:16 |
| @rnhmjoj:maxwell.ydns.eu | how is rust in terms of reproducibility? | 18:42:33 |
| raitobezarius | binary repro? | 18:42:42 |
| @rnhmjoj:maxwell.ydns.eu | yes | 18:42:53 |
| raitobezarius | https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/34902 | 18:43:12 |
| @rnhmjoj:maxwell.ydns.eu | tl;dr? | 18:45:12 |
| raitobezarius | they are committed to it, but sometimes it breaks | 18:45:20 |
 @ulli:hrnz.li | (rustc does not reproduce in nixpkgs) | 18:45:58 |
| @rnhmjoj:maxwell.ydns.eu | rustc itself or rustc-generated binaries? | 18:46:01 |
| raitobezarius | this is about rustc-generated binaries | 18:46:12 |
| raitobezarius | which rustc is | 18:46:15 |
| @ulli:hrnz.li | https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/issues/229858 | 18:46:30 |
