| 17 Aug 2021 |
 Atemu | https://github.com/grahamc/r13y.com/issues/28 | 15:15:58 |
 baloo | fair fair, but what I don't understand is why it does not produce output for the minimal iso since last thursday | 15:17:04 |
| baloo | https://buildkite.com/grahamc/r13y-dot-com/builds/854#9b7f3b86-36e5-4c7f-92cd-c4442bc7f7b6/41-47 | 15:18:16 |
| baloo | https://r13y.com/iso_minimal/index.html iso_minimal got uploaded | 15:18:42 |
 @grahamc:nixos.org | I had an outage and didn’t fix it until
This morning 😬 | 15:54:30 |
 j4m3s | I'm confused, why is there multiple XXX-bash-44 on the failed iso_minimal ? I know the unchecked is because it failed, I'm asking why there'd be multiple bash derivations ? There is multiple use of bash with different inputs in nixpkgs ? | 15:56:56 |
 toonn | Maybe it's bash from difference stages of the stdenv? | 16:00:22 |
 @linus.heckemann:matrix.mayflower.de | Those are the patches applied to bash | 17:06:58 |
| @linus.heckemann:matrix.mayflower.de | Because bash's release model is a bit weird. | 17:08:13 |
