| 12 Jul 2021 |
 andi- | so you would need to do something like nix-store --query --deriver | xargs -n1 nix-build --check etc.. | 17:01:24 |
 hexa | hm --check just returns | 17:03:42 |
| andi- | Perhaps you are trying to reproduce a wrapper script which has an almost zero amount of build time? | 17:04:14 |
| hexa | firefox-wayland ._. | 17:04:27 |
| andi- | It will only reproduce the derivation that you give it NOT the entire closure | 17:04:31 |
| hexa | right, retrying unwrapped | 17:04:31 |
| hexa | thanks! | 17:04:51 |
| hexa |
error: could not compile gkrust
| 17:34:36 |
| hexa | not reproducible! :D | 17:34:41 |
| 17 Jul 2021 |
|  Michael Lieberman joined the room. | 04:07:23 |
|  shadowninja55 joined the room. | 19:37:57 |
| shadowninja55 | has anyone used tinycc? gcc seems to read NIX_CFLAGS_COMPILE or something that includes include paths, while tinycc is missing a ton and requires me to specify them manually. | 19:38:44 |
| shadowninja55 | it makes me think tinycc on nixpkgs isn't wrapped correctly or something. | 19:38:53 |
| shadowninja55 | * it makes me think tinycc on nixpkgs isn't wrapped correctly or something. | 19:38:58 |
| shadowninja55 | * it makes me think tinycc on nixpkgs isn't wrapped correctly or something | 19:39:00 |
| 18 Jul 2021 |
|  yusdacra joined the room. | 08:01:04 |
|  yusdacra changed their profile picture. | 08:04:26 |
|  dan joined the room. | 13:22:27 |
| 19 Jul 2021 |
 Reventlov | Redacted or Malformed Event | 10:58:45 |
| Reventlov | Redacted or Malformed Event | 10:58:59 |
 raboof | In reply to @rgrunbla:matrix.org
Is there some information somewhere about the minimal package set needed to bootstrap a nix system ? I'm not aware of any, but agree it's interesting ;) | 11:02:43 |
| Reventlov | Redacted or Malformed Event | 11:03:00 |
| andi- | You can look at the bootstrap tarball. From the top of my head those contain:
- static busybox (with unxz, ash and tar applet in i686 mode but could be 64bit as well on x86)
- patchelf to patch the binaries included in the tarball
- glibc
- a reduced set of GCC libs (for example the C++ std::fs .so is missing)
- a version of bash, gzip, coreutils and i believe GNU make
| 11:31:25 |
| andi- | * You can look at the bootstrap tarball. From the top of my head those contain:
- static busybox (with unxz, ash and tar applet in i686 mode but could be 64bit as well on x86)
- patchelf to patch the binaries included in the tarball
- glibc
- a reduced set of GCC libs (for example the C++ std::fs .so is missing)
- a version of bash, gzip, coreutils and i believe GNU make
- obviously a copy of glibc
| 11:31:54 |
| andi- | I've a branch where I tried to get rid of patchelf during the bootstrap phase we ca could use relative RPATHs. | 11:32:38 |
| andi- | * I've a branch where I tried to get rid of patchelf as during the bootstrap phase we can could use relative RPATHs. | 11:32:49 |
| andi- | That work ended up requriing patching each and every binary in the tarball (after unpacking) with a wrapper script that invokes the correct dynamic loader with them... Not sure how Guix gets around that issue of the bootstrap files requiring a dynamic loader. | 11:34:08 |
| andi- | All the talk about the minimal bootstrap are great but how do you execute the very first shell that you spawn you MES stuff with? | 11:34:40 |
| andi- | * All the talk about the minimal bootstrap are great but how do you execute the very first shell that you spawn your MES stuff with? | 11:34:49 |
| Reventlov | Redacted or Malformed Event | 11:40:22 |
