| 5 Jul 2021 |
atemu12 | Redacted or Malformed Event | 08:50:39 |
atemu12 | tomberek: It already tries to verify the GNOME ISO too but it runs out of space currently: https://github.com/grahamc/r13y.com/issues/28 | 08:52:07 |
atemu12 | A Hydra job like Jonas Chevalier suggested would probably be a better solution all-together | 08:53:37 |
| spacesbot - keeps a log of public NixOS channels joined the room. | 19:19:25 |
| spacesbot - keeps a log of public NixOS channels | 19:49:32 |
| 6 Jul 2021 |
| @nurelin:matrix.org joined the room. | 11:41:55 |
| 7c6f434c left the room. | 15:49:10 |
| @obfusk:matrix.org changed their display name from 幸猫 to 幸猫 (they/them). | 18:58:17 |
| @obfusk:matrix.org changed their display name from 幸猫 (they/them) to 幸猫 (𝑡ℎ𝑒𝑦/𝑡ℎ𝑒𝑚). | 19:11:06 |
| spacesbot - keeps a log of public NixOS channels changed their display name from spacesbot to spacesbot - keeps a log of public NixOS channels. | 22:11:38 |
| @obfusk:matrix.org changed their display name from 幸猫 (𝑡ℎ𝑒𝑦/𝑡ℎ𝑒𝑚) to 幸猫 (𝗍𝗁𝖾𝗒/𝗍𝗁𝖾𝗆). | 22:40:31 |
| 7 Jul 2021 |
| stefandeml joined the room. | 08:25:46 |
tomberek | I'm running some tests of r13y locally and will try to work my way up to running the graphical ISO. | 19:39:08 |
| 9 Jul 2021 |
tomberek | iso_minimal works. running gnome, hoping to avoid the disk space problem.... | 01:21:14 |
davidak | tomberek i asked myself if the iso file is actually reproducible. is that checked? | 02:55:25 |
raboof | In reply to @davidak:matrix.org tomberek i asked myself if the iso file is actually reproducible. is that checked? I have tried building the iso from different old NixOS images, IIRC they were indeed identical among themselves (so in that sense you could say it is 'actually reproducible'), but comparing to the iso's published on the website I ran into https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/issues/125380 | 07:22:14 |
siraben | Is there a way to override stdenv when I build the ISO? | 11:38:06 |
| vika (she/her) 🏳️⚧️ set a profile picture. | 16:38:46 |
tomberek | raboof: that seems to be a good next step, iso reproducibility | 17:31:01 |
| 10 Jul 2021 |
tomberek | iso_gnome report: https://tomberek.info/r13y.com/ | 16:31:16 |
Rick (Mindavi) | Great work! I see some dates, and mostly pyc files | 16:38:57 |
| 11 Jul 2021 |
| nielse joined the room. | 11:24:00 |
| 12 Jul 2021 |
| Andrea Pascal joined the room. | 01:31:24 |
hexa | how do I test a single package if it is reproducible? | 17:00:08 |
andi- | nix-build <...> --check | 17:00:25 |
hexa | is that really sufficient? | 17:00:32 |
hexa | * is that really sufficient in the r13y sense? | 17:00:40 |
andi- | That tests if that given package is reproducible on your CPU and hardware | 17:00:45 |
andi- | r13y.com does that for the entire closure | 17:00:57 |
hexa | not quite, given the package in my cache was built on a remote builder | 17:01:06 |