| 24 Oct 2023 |
 raboof | looks like we're on version 2.12-rc1, for which there is no release tarball... | 12:02:09 |
 trofi | I think it should be "fine" to use even older translations. Another option is to host the tarball somewhere. | 12:38:16 |
| raboof | it seems the new translations correspond to a new POT which has updated line numbers, so I'm not sure 'just' using the ones from 2.06 would work. I've emailed Translation Project to see if they'd be interested in hosting snapshots | 14:17:09 |
 Pol | I was about to propose that too | 15:33:46 |
|  Greg Burd joined the room. | 19:51:31 |
| 25 Oct 2023 |
|  @federicodschonborn:matrix.org changed their profile picture. | 00:12:40 |
| raboof | (Translation Project aren't interested in providing history) | 12:48:54 |
| trofi | That makes sense. It feels more appropriate to keep the history within the project itself. | 13:19:05 |
 Rick (Mindavi) | Or use a backup thingey like archive.<tld> | 14:57:43 |
| Rick (Mindavi) | I recall that being done sometimes too for things in nixpkgs without stable url | 14:58:11 |
| Rick (Mindavi) | E.g. https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/blob/0540b299093e9b398b06cfb29b53c67b45fff7a7/pkgs/applications/audio/spotify/darwin.nix#L16
But not sure if that works with that rsync call :) | 16:33:50 |
| 26 Oct 2023 |
|  @lotte:chir.rs changed their profile picture. | 06:50:37 |
|  WrenIX joined the room. | 20:23:58 |
|  @lehmanator:gnulinux.club joined the room. | 20:39:35 |
| 27 Oct 2023 |
| @federicodschonborn:matrix.org changed their profile picture. | 01:24:17 |
| raboof | https://github.com/NixOS/nix/issues/9251 I could swear I've seen this before, but couldn't find a ticket... | 09:20:45 |
| 28 Oct 2023 |
| raboof | https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/issues/263898 🤔 | 06:51:50 |
| Pol | I'm trying to check how to fix this issue: https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/issues/230288 | 12:32:39 |
| Pol | I see the command nix-build ... with a --check flag. | 12:32:53 |
| Pol | I can't find documentation on that flag. | 12:33:01 |
| Pol | Do you have some info about it? | 12:33:08 |
 @r522:matrix.org | In reply to @drupol:matrix.org
I can't find documentation on that flag. it's documented as part of nix-store | 12:33:54 |
| Pol | Oki checking this out. | 12:34:25 |
| @r522:matrix.org |
All options not listed here are passed to nix-store --realise, except for --arg and --attr / -A which are passed to nix-instantiate.
(in nix-build(1))
| 12:34:38 |
| @r522:matrix.org | *
All options not listed here are passed to nix-store --realise, except for --arg and --attr / -A which are passed to nix-instantiate.
(in nix-build(1))
| 12:34:41 |
| Pol | It's not even documented in nix-store :( | 12:35:34 |
| @r522:matrix.org | it is in my man page? | 12:36:04 |
| @r522:matrix.org | also https://nixos.org/manual/nix/unstable/command-ref/nix-store/realise | 12:36:24 |
| @r522:matrix.org |
This option allows you to check whether a derivation is deterministic. It rebuilds the specified derivation and checks whether the result is bitwise-identical with the existing outputs, printing an error if that’s not the case. The outputs of the specified derivation must already exist. When used with -K, if an output path is not identical to the corresponding output from the previous build, the new output path is left in /nix/store/name.check.
| 12:36:42 |
| Pol | got it now, but nothing when I do man nix-store here. | 12:37:37 |
