| 26 Oct 2024 |
 gluonix | Does this also mean that we cannot use docker build to build nix packages, but instead we must create the build environment with docker and use docker run --privileged ... ro tun a container in which we build the nix package? | 00:52:39 |
| gluonix | * Does this also mean that we cannot use docker build to build sandboxed nix packages, but instead we must create the build environment with docker and use docker run --privileged ... ro tun a container in which we build the nix package? | 00:53:00 |
 Artturin | I don't know what docker build does | 00:53:25 |
| Artturin | https://stackoverflow.com/questions/48098671/build-with-docker-and-privileged | 00:54:44 |
| gluonix | whoa, thanks, that was exactly what I was asking about | 00:55:47 |
| Artturin | You could just build the image with nix instead of docker build | 00:56:59 |
| Artturin | * You could just build the image with nix instead of docker build
There's builders for that in nixpkgs. | 00:59:53 |
| gluonix | ah yes, good idea, the reason I wish to use docker right now is for integration purposes as we have a larger system that uses docker to build "stuff" and we only nix for a specific component as it has higher requirements with respect to reproducible builds | 01:02:26 |
| gluonix | as you may know, nix has a steep learning curve, hence most dev teams prefer docker, unless they have no choice 😆 | 01:03:01 |
| 29 Oct 2024 |
|  Julian Zboril changed their profile picture. | 17:10:18 |
|  eva removed their profile picture. | 22:26:39 |
| eva set a profile picture. | 22:26:54 |
| 30 Oct 2024 |
|  @seapat:matrix.org left the room. | 07:49:55 |
| 2 Nov 2024 |
|  Mel joined the room. | 03:07:18 |
|  drownbes changed their display name from Artem Markov to drownbes. | 08:42:16 |
| 5 Nov 2024 |
|  @grossmap:in.tum.de left the room. | 14:15:59 |
| 6 Nov 2024 |
|  @peddie:matrix.org left the room. | 12:33:19 |
| 8 Nov 2024 |
|  @printfn:matrix.org left the room. | 06:13:24 |
 p14 | I know there was some interest in having a PGO/LTO/BOLT clang build, as well. Some notes on build reproduciblity when PGO is involved: https://discourse.llvm.org/t/pgo-profile-reproducibility/82861/6
TL;DR: For profiles it is not enough for the profiling mechanism to be deterministic and the workload to have a deterministic output; the workload must compute the output in a flow-control deterministic way. Clang unfortunately uses inodes in a hash map, which makes the profile not reproducible, so it's not currently possible to have a reproducible PGO clang build. (Unless you control the inode integers that clang sees during profiling, among other horrible details). | 11:41:38 |
| 12 Nov 2024 |
|  pfhuh joined the room. | 05:55:01 |
| 13 Nov 2024 |
|  inayet joined the room. | 22:16:32 |
| 15 Nov 2024 |
|  Diamond (it/she) changed their profile picture. | 23:00:53 |
| 17 Nov 2024 |
|  @orzklv:matrix.org joined the room. | 02:29:19 |
| 19 Nov 2024 |
| Diamond (it/she) changed their profile picture. | 21:15:40 |
| 20 Nov 2024 |
| inayet removed their profile picture. | 00:59:09 |
| 22 Nov 2024 |
|  Morgan (@numinit) joined the room. | 17:50:55 |
| 27 Nov 2024 |
|  @sky1e:mildlyfunctional.gay left the room. | 03:15:14 |
|  @meidam:matrix.org left the room. | 10:58:30 |
|  jopejoe1 changed their display name from jopejoe1 to jopejoe1 [4094]. | 18:17:52 |
| 28 Nov 2024 |
|  @honnip:matrix.org left the room. | 04:03:35 |
