| 2 May 2026 |
|  isabel changed their profile picture. | 23:31:28 |
| 8 May 2026 |
|  jopejoe1 changed their display name from jopejoe1 (4094@epvpn) to jopejoe1. | 08:42:23 |
| 10 May 2026 |
 emily | https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2026/05/msg00001.html | 16:08:52 |
| emily | Aided by the efforts of the Reproducible Builds project [1], we've decided it's
time to say that Debian must ship reproducible packages. Since yesterday, we
have enabled our migration software to block migration of new packages that
can't be reproduced [2] or existing packages (in testing) that regress in
reproducibility. | 16:09:03 |
 raboof | Something to aspire to! | 17:18:23 |
| 13 May 2026 |
 ethancedwards8 | hmmm | 16:59:17 |
| ethancedwards8 | this has me thinking | 16:59:20 |
| ethancedwards8 | is there a way to make nixpkgs-review report on if a package is reproducible or not? maybe this is something we want to start looking at in reviews | 17:00:01 |
 Pol | Excellent idea :) but that would probably slow down the review. I don't mind actually, it's a great idea. | 17:48:55 |
 nim65s | That would basically require building stuff x4 I guess ? | 20:13:06 |
| ethancedwards8 | why 4x? | 21:42:59 |
| ethancedwards8 | i thought just 2x? | 21:43:05 |
| ethancedwards8 | this should probably just be opt-in | 21:43:20 |
| ethancedwards8 | i'll think about this and try to work on it this weekend (7 hours flight ahead of me :( ) | 21:43:47 |
