| 16 May 2025 |
 emily | but I think only for by-name packages, not modules | 11:49:48 |
 hexa | That is news to me | 11:50:45 |
| emily | I think it is long past due for m1cr0man to get commit bit tbh (and I am sorry for not putting more time into ACME the past few years, though I do still look at/sometimes comment on PRs) | 11:50:48 |
| emily | it was not announced super loudly :) | 11:50:56 |
| emily | oh, maybe it's only PRs made by committers: https://discourse.nixos.org/t/nixpkgs-merge-bot-committer-pull-request-merge-strategy/58227 | 11:51:19 |
| emily | put a nomination up https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/issues/321665#issuecomment-2886516818 | 11:58:10 |
 m1cr0man | Oh, well thank you 🙂 I never really wanted to ask as the level of responsibility and commitment it implies is more than I thought I deserve for the consistency in my contributions | 13:05:08 |
| m1cr0man | In reply to @emilazy:matrix.org
I think it is long past due for m1cr0man to get commit bit tbh (and I am sorry for not putting more time into ACME the past few years, though I do still look at/sometimes comment on PRs) Aren't you on the steering committee plus half a dozen other projects? 😂 Yeah don't worry about it. I appreciate the time you put in here helping steer the design back when you started contributing | 13:06:29 |
| emily | I think it's more responsibility than commitment :) | 13:06:36 |
| emily | as long as you/the project get value out of you being able to hit the merge button, and you hit it responsibly, it's all good for any level of activity > 0 | 13:07:00 |
| emily | (not on the SC, thank god) | 13:07:46 |
| emily | (but I do try to juggle too many hats) | 13:07:53 |
