!MthpOIxqJhTgrMNxDS:nixos.org

NixOS ACME / LetsEncrypt

86 Members
Another day, another cert renewal39 Servers

Load older messages


SenderMessageTime
3 Jun 2024
@sandro:supersandro.deSandro 🐧Maybe we should couple that with a warning that people should set the URL explicit11:23:12
@sandro:supersandro.deSandro 🐧but then, is that worth it? I dono11:23:20
@ccppuu:matrix.orgCPU
In reply to @arianvp:matrix.org
If there are any volunteers to join the team just yell ;)
:wave: I would be interested. Is commented on #316854 the best way to get looped in?
14:45:48
@ccppuu:matrix.orgCPU
In reply to @arianvp:matrix.org
If there are any volunteers to join the team just yell ;)
* :wave: I would be interested. Is commenting on #316854 the best way to get looped in?
14:45:54
@arianvp:matrix.orgArian StΓ©phan: yeh that looks perfect. Wanna open a PR for that? 18:42:18
4 Jun 2024
@raitobezarius:matrix.orgraitobezarius changed their display name from raitobezarius (DECT: 7248) to raitobezarius.11:14:33
@os:matrix.flyingcircus.ioosnyx (he/him)
In reply to @stephank:stephank.nl
I like that too. Something like this? https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/compare/master...stephank:nixpkgs:fix-acme2
Looks good, IMHO that's a good alternative to the state convergence approach.
13:56:18
@os:matrix.flyingcircus.ioosnyx (he/him)
In reply to @stephank:stephank.nl
I like that too. Something like this? https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/compare/master...stephank:nixpkgs:fix-acme2
* Looks good, IMHO that's a decent alternative to the state convergence approach.
13:56:34
@m1cr0man:m1cr0man.comm1cr0manhttps://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/270221 damn, had I seen this I would have reviewed for sure18:32:08
@m1cr0man:m1cr0man.comm1cr0manLiterally started a new job today, sorry I haven't been around for the incident18:32:26
@arianvp:matrix.orgArianCongrats on the new job!18:54:49
@arianvp:matrix.orgArianhttps://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/31725718:55:17
@arianvp:matrix.orgArianAlso added https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/317261 so we get automatically tagged for review in the future18:56:41
@m1cr0man:m1cr0man.comm1cr0manThank you πŸ™‚. Okay, I can review those. Possibly right now18:57:33
@arianvp:matrix.orgArianThe backport failed to due a merge conflict and my git foo is not good enough. Help would be appreciated https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/317257#issuecomment-214833987320:13:59
@arianvp:matrix.orgArianit's late here and my brain is fried :') 20:14:14
@sandro:supersandro.deSandro 🐧

git checkout release-24.11 -b backport-xxxx
git cherry-pick hash
vim file/path

fix the issue

git add file/path
git cherry-pick --continue
git push

20:36:47
@sandro:supersandro.deSandro 🐧 *
git checkout release-24.11 -b backport-xxxx
git cherry-pick hash
vim file/path
# fix the issue
git add file/path
git cherry-pick --continue
git push
20:36:58
@sandro:supersandro.deSandro 🐧and yeah, that PR should be backported πŸ™‚20:37:37
@m1cr0man:m1cr0man.comm1cr0man
In reply to @sandro:supersandro.de
git checkout release-24.11 -b backport-xxxx
git cherry-pick hash
vim file/path
# fix the issue
git add file/path
git cherry-pick --continue
git push
Huh, did not know you could check out a ref with -b at the same time. I always checkout then checkout again 😜
20:54:34
@sandro:supersandro.deSandro 🐧
In reply to @m1cr0man:m1cr0man.com
Huh, did not know you could check out a ref with -b at the same time. I always checkout then checkout again 😜
TYL
22:01:39
5 Jun 2024
@arianvp:matrix.orgArianall done! thanks all06:37:01
@stephank:stephank.nlStΓ©phan Arian: Thanks for carrying the PR through. I'm in the middle of a move, so couldn't respond in time. πŸ™‚ 08:07:45
7 Jun 2024
@alex3829:matrix.org@alex3829:matrix.org removed their display name real_z2.23:44:21
24 Jun 2024
@janik0:matrix.org@janik0:matrix.org left the room.13:05:57
29 Jun 2024
@mib:kanp.aimib πŸ₯ joined the room.22:24:48
2 Jul 2024
@os:matrix.flyingcircus.ioosnyx (he/him)Hey, any progress on https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/318818? The tests now pass.20:59:58
@emilazy:matrix.orgemilyis the aarch64 failure just flakiness?21:03:10
@os:matrix.flyingcircus.ioosnyx (he/him)Good question, I don't have the hardware. I can see whether I can re-trigger the ofborg test. But I can say that the test failure is not in the subtest I've touched, but much earlier.21:36:01
@os:matrix.flyingcircus.ioosnyx (he/him)I'm using ofborg far too rarely, is it possible to call the test just for a specific platform?21:38:24

Show newer messages


Back to Room ListRoom Version: 6