31 Jan 2024 |
Train | Is it normal to use a loopback address such as this one: 127.0.0.53:53 | 19:13:48 |
Train | * Is it normal to use a loopback address such as this one: 127.0.0.53:53? | 19:17:30 |
ajs124 | if you're using systemd resolved, yes | 22:02:01 |
1 Feb 2024 |
m1cr0man | In reply to @atra1n:matrix.org Is it normal to use a loopback address such as this one: 127.0.0.53:53? Yes and you can also set it through the ACME options :) | 00:36:31 |
7 Feb 2024 |
| netpleb joined the room. | 21:27:59 |
netpleb | i am getting : 2024/02/07 21:34:52 Could not create client: get directory at 'https://acme-v02.api.letsencrypt.org/directory': Get "https://acme-v02.api.letsencrypt.org/directory": dial tcp: lookup acme-v02.api.letsencrypt.org: Temporary failure in name resolution with self-hosted bind (followed the manual) dns-01 validation | 21:38:12 |
K900 | Sounds like DNS | 21:39:09 |
netpleb | In reply to @k900:0upti.me Sounds like DNS right, so I just thought of one thing which might fix it (i feel like i have tried everything already)...but this server actually gets its public ip via a wireguard interface, and I used wg-quick in that interface and did set the dns = [ <some server> ] option. I am going to remove that and cross my fingers! :-) | 21:40:35 |
netpleb | hmm, sadly that did not seem to solve it | 21:44:40 |
netpleb | what logs should i post which would help diagnose? | 21:44:54 |
netpleb | Redacted or Malformed Event | 21:46:52 |
K900 | Do you actually have working DNS? | 21:49:31 |
K900 | Like, can you ping that domain name? | 21:49:39 |
netpleb | yes, I can ping that domain name no problem | 21:50:12 |
netpleb | [root@netpleb-public-services:~]# systemctl status acme-netpleb.com.service
○ acme-netpleb.com.service - Renew ACME certificate for netpleb.com
Loaded: loaded (/etc/systemd/system/acme-netpleb.com.service; linked; preset: enabled)
Active: inactive (dead)
TriggeredBy: ● acme-netpleb.com.timer
Feb 07 21:48:41 netpleb-public-services systemd[1]: Dependency failed for Renew ACME certificate for netpleb.com.
Feb 07 21:48:41 netpleb-public-services systemd[1]: acme-netpleb.com.service: Job acme-netpleb.com.service/start failed with result 'dependency'.
[root@netpleb-public-services:~]# ping netpleb.com
PING netpleb.com (38.45.103.128) 56(84) bytes of data.
64 bytes from ns1.netpleb.com (38.45.103.128): icmp_seq=1 ttl=64 time=0.041 ms
64 bytes from ns1.netpleb.com (38.45.103.128): icmp_seq=2 ttl=64 time=0.064 ms
^C
--- netpleb.com ping statistics ---
2 packets transmitted, 2 received, 0% packet loss, time 1064ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 0.041/0.052/0.064/0.011 ms
| 21:51:06 |
K900 | Not that | 21:51:36 |
K900 | acme-v02.api.letsencrypt.org | 21:51:46 |
K900 | Can you ping that? | 21:51:49 |
netpleb | hmm, nope! wtf, I can ping google.com just fine though. What is going on? | 21:53:15 |
K900 | You have a DNS problem | 21:55:01 |
K900 | Have fun | 21:55:03 |
netpleb | I am obviously not an expert in these things (though getting to know/learn Nix, both the language and the OS has been overall a rewarding experience). How is it possible that I can ping google but not letsencrypt? | 21:58:24 |
netpleb | * ... | 21:59:26 |
K900 | Something about your DNS config is broken | 22:01:14 |
K900 | That's not really a NixOS problem | 22:01:23 |
K900 | More of a general networking problem | 22:01:28 |
netpleb | ok, sorry, i fixed the dns issue already. I am now able to ping it:
[root@netpleb-public-services:~]# ping acme-v02.api.letsencrypt.org
PING ca80a1adb12a4fbdac5ffcbc944e9a61.pacloudflare.com (172.65.32.248) 56(84) bytes of data.
64 bytes from 172.65.32.248: icmp_seq=1 ttl=59 time=94.5 ms
64 bytes from 172.65.32.248: icmp_seq=2 ttl=59 time=93.1 ms
64 bytes from 172.65.32.248: icmp_seq=3 ttl=59 time=108 ms
64 bytes from 172.65.32.248: icmp_seq=4 ttl=59 time=100 ms
| 22:02:04 |
K900 | Now you can restart the ACME service | 22:03:14 |
K900 | And maybe it'll actually succeed | 22:03:18 |
netpleb | In reply to @k900:0upti.me Now you can restart the ACME service ok, is there a "parent" acme service i should restart that will redo all of them? i have one for a subdomain and one for the tld | 22:04:03 |