| 21 Oct 2024 |
 emily | Fabián Heredia: I'm thinking we should just revert and do this again if the whack-a-mole with the eval issues continues beyond another push | 17:39:56 |
| emily | I'll open a revert | 17:40:38 |
| emily | merged the revert, sorry about that. better to clean up the strays without time pressure | 17:45:02 |
 Fabián Heredia | In reply to @emilazy:matrix.org
Fabián Heredia: I'm thinking we should just revert and do this again if the whack-a-mole with the eval issues continues beyond another push yeah | 17:45:27 |
| Fabián Heredia | In reply to @emilazy:matrix.org
merged the revert, sorry about that. better to clean up the strays without time pressure sure, no worries | 17:45:39 |
| Fabián Heredia | https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/350291
vet is happy now but we should probably wait for the whole CI 😅 | 18:00:34 |
 aleksana (force me to bed after 18:00 UTC) | In reply to @fabianhjr:matrix.org
There was a time when aliases couldn't warn not too long ago if I recall correctly Also people complaining it being too noisy in nix search | 18:07:23 |
| emily | that ship has already sailed, nix search spits out a billion warnings | 18:07:43 |
| 22 Oct 2024 |
|  willbush changed their profile picture. | 09:29:08 |
|  aktaboot changed their profile picture. | 12:11:08 |
| 23 Oct 2024 |
| aktaboot changed their profile picture. | 19:54:02 |
| emily | Nix security update incoming https://discourse.nixos.org/t/2024-10-23-nix-team-meeting-minutes-189/54841 | 21:09:50 |
| 24 Oct 2024 |
 Mic92 | Has someone experience with preparing nixpkgs patches in private forks? So github has this security advisory feature but it seems that nixpkgs is too big for this. I also tried pushing nixpkgs as a private repository with the same result. | 03:44:35 |
 tgerbet | GHSA are annoying because they require repo admin permission to be created/published/managed.
I usually forward patch files :/ | 08:27:21 |
 osnyx (he/him) | Anyone at NixCon who'd be interested in discussing how we can better handel the Gitlab upgrade cycle for stable NixOS releases? security patch backporting for at most 3 months makes switching to at least another minor release necessary within a NixOS cycle. | 10:10:41 |
| 4 Jul 2022 |
|  lassulus joined the room. | 13:33:52 |
 dotlambda | In reply to @linus:schreibt.jetzt
lassulus: django <- typogrify <- gi-docgen <- librsvg https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/180120 | 14:19:51 |
|  ar joined the room. | 16:44:27 |
|  Andrea Pascal joined the room. | 18:01:32 |
| 5 Jul 2022 |
 @pennae:matrix.eno.space | oh, there's been an issue closing spree for 21.11 cves :D | 00:52:55 |
 hexa | https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/issues/174764 | 01:31:15 |
| hexa | sure … don't care about security issues for two months and then close it | 01:31:29 |
| hexa | I'm not pleased. | 01:31:43 |
 Alyssa Ross | I wonder what to do about that GnuPG patch | 06:16:10 |
| Alyssa Ross | unlike the last one, it hasn't been merged yet | 06:16:22 |
| Alyssa Ross | and "werner removed a reviewer: werner." | 06:16:28 |
| Alyssa Ross | so it wouldn't surprise me if there's been a falling out and it won't be, at least not any time soon… | 06:16:51 |
| Alyssa Ross | (a falling out due to the disclosure of the previous issue, I maen) | 06:17:04 |
|  bdd joined the room. | 06:39:48 |
|  arno joined the room. | 08:18:08 |
