| 21 Oct 2024 |
 emily | Fabián Heredia: I'm thinking we should just revert and do this again if the whack-a-mole with the eval issues continues beyond another push | 17:39:56 |
| emily | I'll open a revert | 17:40:38 |
| emily | merged the revert, sorry about that. better to clean up the strays without time pressure | 17:45:02 |
 Fabián Heredia | In reply to @emilazy:matrix.org
Fabián Heredia: I'm thinking we should just revert and do this again if the whack-a-mole with the eval issues continues beyond another push yeah | 17:45:27 |
| Fabián Heredia | In reply to @emilazy:matrix.org
merged the revert, sorry about that. better to clean up the strays without time pressure sure, no worries | 17:45:39 |
| Fabián Heredia | https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/350291
vet is happy now but we should probably wait for the whole CI 😅 | 18:00:34 |
 aleksana (force me to bed after 18:00 UTC) | In reply to @fabianhjr:matrix.org
There was a time when aliases couldn't warn not too long ago if I recall correctly Also people complaining it being too noisy in nix search | 18:07:23 |
| emily | that ship has already sailed, nix search spits out a billion warnings | 18:07:43 |
| 22 Oct 2024 |
|  willbush changed their profile picture. | 09:29:08 |
|  aktaboot changed their profile picture. | 12:11:08 |
| 23 Oct 2024 |
| aktaboot changed their profile picture. | 19:54:02 |
| emily | Nix security update incoming https://discourse.nixos.org/t/2024-10-23-nix-team-meeting-minutes-189/54841 | 21:09:50 |
| 24 Oct 2024 |
 Mic92 | Has someone experience with preparing nixpkgs patches in private forks? So github has this security advisory feature but it seems that nixpkgs is too big for this. I also tried pushing nixpkgs as a private repository with the same result. | 03:44:35 |
 tgerbet | GHSA are annoying because they require repo admin permission to be created/published/managed.
I usually forward patch files :/ | 08:27:21 |
 osnyx (he/him) | Anyone at NixCon who'd be interested in discussing how we can better handel the Gitlab upgrade cycle for stable NixOS releases? security patch backporting for at most 3 months makes switching to at least another minor release necessary within a NixOS cycle. | 10:10:41 |
| 25 Oct 2024 |
| emily | In reply to @tgerbet:matrix.org
Yeah I wanted to create a tracking issue so we can follow this more closely and see how it evolves over time but I did not get the time to do it FWIW, I've opened https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/351205 and https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/351206. | 15:48:44 |
| emily | In reply to @tgerbet:matrix.org
Yeah I wanted to create a tracking issue so we can follow this more closely and see how it evolves over time but I did not get the time to do it * FWIW, I've opened https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/351205 and https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/351206. | 15:48:59 |
| 26 Oct 2024 |
|  plmh joined the room. | 05:19:55 |
|  ·☽•Nameless☆•777 · ± changed their profile picture. | 07:04:10 |
| ·☽•Nameless☆•777 · ± changed their profile picture. | 07:07:56 |
| willbush left the room. | 23:42:04 |
|  Morgan (@numinit) left the room. | 23:46:43 |
| 27 Oct 2024 |
| willbush joined the room. | 00:04:32 |
| emily | hexa: did you want https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/351205#pullrequestreview-2396239364 done? I'm agnostic since I'm not the one who does any actual Thunderbird work. (just making sure the PR is ready for before ZHF, if we decide to merge it – don't feel like self-merging is appropriate.) | 15:59:16 |
 hexa | would have expected the author to comment | 15:59:44 |
| hexa | * would have expected the package maintainer to comment | 15:59:52 |
| emily | best to give it a week I guess? | 16:10:09 |
| emily | but just wanted to check whether the Thunderbird revert is desired. | 16:10:21 |
| hexa | ask vcunat | 16:11:25 |
| hexa | I don't maintain thunderbird | 16:11:30 |
