!NhAsaYbbgmzHtXTPQJ:funklause.de

Nix NodeJS

207 Members
59 Servers

Load older messages


SenderMessageTime
22 May 2023
@raitobezarius:matrix.orgraitobezariusis there a way to extract a nodejs from buildNpmPackage function?12:11:02
@raitobezarius:matrix.orgraitobezariusor the result of the buildNpmPackage?12:11:06
@lily:lily.flowersLily FosterLike what nodejs that buildNpmPackage is using?12:16:48
@lily:lily.flowersLily FosterNo, but we maybe should add it as a passthrough or something12:17:17
@lily:lily.flowersLily Foster
In reply to @raitobezarius:matrix.org
or the result of the buildNpmPackage?
Like the output, or am I misunderstanding?
12:17:33
@raitobezarius:matrix.orgraitobezarius
In reply to @lily:lily.flowers
Like what nodejs that buildNpmPackage is using?
yes this
12:17:45
@robert:funklause.dedotlambda
In reply to @lily:lily.flowers
dotlambda: If it helps for fixing the above package, would it be okay if I separate out the change to add an npmWorkspace argument from that bitwarden-cli PR and make my own separate PR? (or alternatively if you have time to respond to the review comments, we can keep the work in that PR)
Definitely! Thank you very much
20:05:25
24 May 2023
@lily:lily.flowersLily Foster
In reply to @raitobezarius:matrix.org
yes this

You're just wanting something like this on buildNpmPackage, right?

diff --git a/pkgs/build-support/node/build-npm-package/default.nix b/pkgs/build-support/node/build-npm-package/default.nix
index 1c3fb6a74ef..f4cb7d763ed 100644
--- a/pkgs/build-support/node/build-npm-package/default.nix
+++ b/pkgs/build-support/node/build-npm-package/default.nix
@@ -53,7 +53,7 @@ stdenv.mkDerivation (args // {
   # Stripping takes way too long with the amount of files required by a typical Node.js project.
   dontStrip = args.dontStrip or true;
 
-  passthru = { inherit npmDeps; } // (args.passthru or { });
+  passthru = { inherit nodejs npmDeps; } // (args.passthru or { });
 
   meta = (args.meta or { }) // { platforms = args.meta.platforms or nodejs.meta.platforms; };
 })
00:21:33
@lily:lily.flowersLily Foster Wait are you wanting (buildNpmPackage { ... }).nodejs to be available or something just like buildNpmPackage.nodejs? 00:22:23
@lily:lily.flowersLily Foster
In reply to @robert:funklause.de
Definitely! Thank you very much
Opened as https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/233804 and tested against your second commit in your bitwarden-cli PR :)
11:18:28
@lily:lily.flowersLily Foster Oh I just noticed your comment about npm prune --workspace being non-ideal. That seems bizarre to me, and remove the --workspace on the prune command didn't seem to reduce output size 🤔 11:23:52
@lily:lily.flowersLily Foster * Oh I just noticed your comment about npm prune --workspace being non-ideal. That seems bizarre to me, and removing the --workspace on the prune command didn't seem to reduce output size 🤔 11:23:59
@lily:lily.flowersLily FosterI'll investigate later today hopefully11:24:08
25 May 2023
@raitobezarius:matrix.orgraitobezarius changed their display name from raitobezarius to disko in NixOS 23.11 when.13:32:24
@raitobezarius:matrix.orgraitobezarius changed their display name from disko in NixOS 23.11 when to raitobezarius.13:37:28
27 May 2023
@mjolnir:nixos.orgNixOS Moderation Botchanged room power levels.16:41:01
28 May 2023
@hellwolf:matrix.orghellwolf joined the room.13:29:10
@hellwolf:matrix.orghellwolf Hey y'all! Let's say I pick a rfew nodePakcages e.g "nodePackages.three|mathjax", what would a one liner say using nix-shell where then I can run node and require("three")? 13:34:44
@lily:lily.flowersLily Foster I think we would need setup hooks that set NODE_PATH. Which actually would probably be a good idea to add to the nodejs derivation 13:41:51
@lily:lily.flowersLily FosterHmmm if I remember later I'll experiment with adding that13:42:18
@hellwolf:matrix.orghellwolf

Okay. Something similar to haskellPackages.ghcWithPackages would be handy, say:

nix-shell -p 'nodejsPackages.nodeWithPackages { pkgs: [ pkgs.three ] } ?

14:06:45
@lily:lily.flowersLily Foster Well it would be something like nodejs.withPackages probably but also nodePackages is gonna go away and/or be redone before that's viable... 14:08:49
@hellwolf:matrix.orghellwolfI see. I don't think it's too big a stretch to proposing the Nth package manager for NodeJS ecosytem, after now pnpm.14:10:06
@hellwolf:matrix.orghellwolfI think Nix has the potential to be the right one :)14:10:19
@hellwolf:matrix.orghellwolfBut still need that Nth nix node builder though too.14:10:54
@hellwolf:matrix.orghellwolfOr is buildNpmPackage targeting that?14:11:25
@hellwolf:matrix.orghellwolf * Or is buildNpmPackage targeting that role? 14:11:27
@lily:lily.flowersLily Foster buildNpmPackage is really more for leaf-like application-level npm packages 14:12:03
@lily:lily.flowersLily Foster At some point we may end up trying to build out a real Nix-based node package set, but npm dependencies go really deep. Unlike how other package sets like python generally are 14:14:08
@lily:lily.flowersLily FosterSo I doubt it'll really be worth it tbh14:14:23

There are no newer messages yet.


Back to Room ListRoom Version: 6