 | Nix Milan | 110 Members |
| https://milano.nix.pizza/ | 7 Servers |
| Nix Milan | 110 Members |
| https://milano.nix.pizza/ | 7 Servers |
| Sender | Message | Time |
|---|---|---|
| 1 Dec 2025 | ||
 Alessandro Candido | In reply to Andrea CiceriMe too | 09:01:30 |
 gecko | Voi che conoscete la nix lore, Randy Eckenrode chi è che è? | 16:44:44 |
 Francesco | Ogni tanto l'ho visto commentare su MR che hanno a che fare con darwin ma più di quello non so | 16:49:24 |
 Matteo Joliveau | In reply to geckoil tizio di Nix-FoundryVTT? | 17:17:03 |
 Andrea Ciceri | In reply to geckome lo ricordo per quello che fece qua: https://discourse.nixos.org/t/on-the-future-of-darwin-sdks-or-how-you-can-stop-worrying-and-put-the-sdk-in-build-inputs/50574 | 18:58:13 |
| 2 Dec 2025 | ||
 Alessandro 🤔➖☀️🖌 | Mentre leggevo questo https://wiki.nixos.org/wiki/Build_flags ho pensato: ma non esiste una cache per dei pacchetti compilati per qualche cpu più recente? Non sarebbe male poter aggiungere un subst per la propria architettura e usare quello come cache crowd-sourced. | 23:49:27 |
| 3 Dec 2025 | ||
| Alessandro 🤔➖☀️🖌 | Come vecchio utente gentoo, posso capirli 😂 | 13:40:15 |
| gecko | In reply to Alessandro 🤔➖☀️🖌https://www.shlomifish.org/humour/by-others/funroll-loops/Gentoo-is-Rice.html | 13:18:57 |
 David | In reply to Alessandro 🤔➖☀️🖌immagino che qualcuno che ha la cache dei suoi sistemi su cachix ci sia, prova a chiedere su matrix e discord magari | 13:30:34 |
| 5 Dec 2025 | ||
 Sergio Besana | ciao, ho fatto qualche 🌵ta, quando faccio il rebuild ho questo errore: | 16:47:56 |
| Sergio Besana | qualcuno mi può aiutare? 😅 | 16:48:33 |
| Sergio Besana | error: … while calling the 'head' builtin at /nix/store/hbwhmq5csqsjf52ciz7cbjpvy042laqw-nixos/nixos/lib/attrsets.nix:1696:13: 1695| if length values == 1 || pred here (elemAt values 1) (head values) then 1696| head values | ^ 1697| else … while evaluating the attribute 'value' at /nix/store/hbwhmq5csqsjf52ciz7cbjpvy042laqw-nixos/nixos/lib/modules.nix:1118:7: 1117| // { 1118| value = addErrorContext "while evaluating the option `${showOption loc}':" value; | ^ 1119| inherit (res.defsFinal') highestPrio; … while evaluating the option `system.build.toplevel': … while evaluating definitions from `/nix/store/hbwhmq5csqsjf52ciz7cbjpvy042laqw-nixos/nixos/nixos/modules/system/activation/top-level.nix': … while evaluating the option `system.systemBuilderArgs': … while evaluating definitions from `/nix/store/hbwhmq5csqsjf52ciz7cbjpvy042laqw-nixos/nixos/nixos/modules/system/activation/activatable-system.nix': … while evaluating the option `system.activationScripts.etc.text': … while evaluating definitions from `/nix/store/hbwhmq5csqsjf52ciz7cbjpvy042laqw-nixos/nixos/nixos/modules/system/etc/etc-activation.nix': … while evaluating definitions from `/nix/store/hbwhmq5csqsjf52ciz7cbjpvy042laqw-nixos/nixos/nixos/modules/system/etc/etc.nix': … while evaluating the option `environment.etc.dbus-1.source': … while evaluating the option `environment.systemPackages': … while evaluating definitions from `/etc/nixos/configuration.nix': (stack trace truncated; use '--show-trace' to show the full, detailed trace) error: libsForQt5.bluez-qt has been removed, as KDE Frameworks 5 has reached end of life. Command 'nix-build '<nixpkgs/nixos>' --attr config.system.build.toplevel --no-out-link' returned non-zero exit status 1. | 16:48:09 |
| David | https://search.nixos.org/packages?channel=25.11&query=bluez-qt | 16:51:09 |
| David | error: libsForQt5.bluez-qt has been removed, as KDE Frameworks 5 has reached end of life.kdePackages.bluez-qt | 16:51:02 |
| Sergio Besana | mi chiede di cancellare altri programmi | 16:57:10 |
| Sergio Besana | … while calling the 'head' builtin at /nix/store/hbwhmq5csqsjf52ciz7cbjpvy042laqw-nixos/nixos/lib/attrsets.nix:1696:13: 1695| if length values == 1 || pred here (elemAt values 1) (head values) then 1696| head values | ^ 1697| else … while evaluating the attribute 'value' at /nix/store/hbwhmq5csqsjf52ciz7cbjpvy042laqw-nixos/nixos/lib/modules.nix:1118:7: 1117| // { 1118| value = addErrorContext "while evaluating the option `${showOption loc}':" value; | ^ 1119| inherit (res.defsFinal') highestPrio; … while evaluating the option `system.build.toplevel': … while evaluating definitions from `/nix/store/hbwhmq5csqsjf52ciz7cbjpvy042laqw-nixos/nixos/nixos/modules/system/activation/top-level.nix': … while evaluating the option `system.systemBuilderArgs': … while evaluating definitions from `/nix/store/hbwhmq5csqsjf52ciz7cbjpvy042laqw-nixos/nixos/nixos/modules/system/activation/activatable-system.nix': … while evaluating the option `system.activationScripts.etc.text': … while evaluating definitions from `/nix/store/hbwhmq5csqsjf52ciz7cbjpvy042laqw-nixos/nixos/nixos/modules/system/etc/etc-activation.nix': … while evaluating definitions from `/nix/store/hbwhmq5csqsjf52ciz7cbjpvy042laqw-nixos/nixos/nixos/modules/system/etc/etc.nix': … while evaluating the option `environment.etc.dbus-1.source': (stack trace truncated; use '--show-trace' to show the full, detailed trace) error: Package ‘qtwebengine-5.15.19’ in /nix/store/hbwhmq5csqsjf52ciz7cbjpvy042laqw-nixos/nixos/pkgs/development/libraries/qt-5/modules/qtwebengine.nix:442 is marked as insecure, refusing to evaluate. Known issues: - qt5 qtwebengine is unmaintained upstream since april 2025. It is based on chromium 87.0.4280.144, and supposedly patched up to 135.0.7049.95 which is outdated. Security issues are frequently discovered in chromium. The following list of CVEs was fixed in the life cycle of chromium 138 and likely also affects qtwebengine: - CVE-2025-8879 - CVE-2025-8880 - CVE-2025-8901 - CVE-2025-8881 - CVE-2025-8882 - CVE-2025-8576 - CVE-2025-8577 - CVE-2025-8578 - CVE-2025-8579 - CVE-2025-8580 - CVE-2025-8581 - CVE-2025-8582 - CVE-2025-8583 - CVE-2025-8292 - CVE-2025-8010 - CVE-2025-8011 - CVE-2025-7656 - CVE-2025-6558 (known to be exploited in the wild) - CVE-2025-7657 - CVE-2025-6554 - CVE-2025-6555 - CVE-2025-6556 - CVE-2025-6557 The actual list of CVEs affecting qtwebengine is likely much longer, as this list is missing issues fixed in chromium 136/137 and even more issues are continuously discovered and lack upstream fixes in qtwebengine. You can install it anyway by allowing this package, using the following methods: a) To temporarily allow all insecure packages, you can use an environment variable for a single invocation of the nix tools: $ export NIXPKGS_ALLOW_INSECURE=1 Note: When using `nix shell`, nix build, nix develop, etc with a flake,then pass --impure in order to allow use of environment variables.b) for nixos-rebuild you can add ‘qtwebengine-5.15.19’ tonixpkgs.config.permittedInsecurePackages in the configuration.nix,like so: { nixpkgs.config.permittedInsecurePackages = [ "qtwebengine-5.15.19" ]; } c) For nix-env, nix-build, nix-shell or any other Nix command you can add‘qtwebengine-5.15.19’ to permittedInsecurePackages in~/.config/nixpkgs/config.nix, like so: | 17:01:17 |
| Sergio Besana | { permittedInsecurePackages = [ "qtwebengine-5.15.19" ]; } Command 'nix-build '<nixpkgs/nixos>' --attr config.system.build.toplevel --no-out-link' returned non-zero exit status 1. | 17:01:17 |
| Sergio Besana | alla fine ho scelto: $ export NIXPKGS_ALLOW_INSECURE=1 e tutto è andato a posto, anche oggi ho imparato qualcosa 😂😂😂 | 17:28:19 |
| 29 Feb 2024 | ||
 @admin:nixos.org changed the history visibility to "world_readable" from "shared". | 12:19:16 | |
 NixOS Moderation Bot joined the room. | 12:19:31 | |
| @admin:nixos.orgchanged room power levels. | 12:20:33 | |
| @admin:nixos.org left the room. | 12:20:52 | |
 fgaz joined the room. | 15:24:24 | |
| 1 Mar 2024 | ||
 aciceri | Questa room ha ora come alias principale #milan:nixos.org ora. E siamo nello space di NixOS! | 11:39:05 |
| aciceri | * Questa room ha ora come alias principale #milan:nixos.org. E siamo nello space di NixOS! | 13:29:32 |
| 2 Mar 2024 | ||
| Matteo Joliveau joined the room. | 09:58:50 | |
| Matteo Joliveau | 👋 | 09:58:29 |
| Matteo Joliveau changed their profile picture. | 09:58:51 | |
| aciceri | In reply to @telegram_25591608:t2bot.iobenvenuto | 15:35:50 |
| Matteo Joliveau | In reply to @aciceri:nixos.devthx | 15:55:41 |