!OqhvaDMJdKYUicLDiE:nixos.org

Nixpkgs Stdenv

221 Members
72 Servers

Load older messages


SenderMessageTime
7 Feb 2025
@terrorjack:matrix.orgterrorjack joined the room.22:45:33
8 Feb 2025
@terrorjack:matrix.orgterrorjack set a profile picture.02:24:25
@terrorjack:matrix.orgterrorjack removed their profile picture.02:24:59
@trofi:matrix.orgtrofi

vcunat: do you remember what needed --oldincludedir= in https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/commit/def75f028240ce2d38ec8e0707cc886c8b7596a4#diff-d5ce1dbe37e35a5baa932aac914a2f1a32ac46267f9400f2fff393f31d4aa44bR36 ? Looking at https://www.gnu.org/prep/standards/html_node/Directory-Variables.html it feels like it's something that predates gcc. It now breaks sqlite-3.49.0 https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/373944#issuecomment-2645813426

And I wonder if we should just drop --oldincludedir= completely.

16:20:31
@trofi:matrix.orgtrofi cmake hook also added it with DCMAKE_INSTALL_OLDINCLUDEDIR https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/commit/c0d2f924590918b0176aaf1f84ccf372ce4f13c4 . I suspect just to follow stdenv. 16:24:37
@vcunat:matrix.orgvcunatNo, I don't recall at all. It's been a bit long :-)16:24:40
@trofi:matrix.orgtrofi:)16:25:00
@trofi:matrix.orgtrofiProposed the removal as https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/38040016:51:24
@trofi:matrix.orgtrofi Also asked on #macos:nixos.org if it's used by any chance there (AFAIU it should not be load-bearing) 16:53:25
13 Feb 2025
@connorbaker:matrix.orgconnor (burnt/out) (UTC-8) changed their display name from connor (he/him) (UTC-7) to connor (he/him) (UTC-8).06:59:21
15 Feb 2025
@benjb83:matrix.orgBenjB83 joined the room.10:16:57
@benjb83:matrix.orgBenjB83 changed their display name from Benjamín Buske to BenjB83.10:43:08
19 Feb 2025
@k900:0upti.meK900So should I just send https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/38032509:51:10
@k900:0upti.meK900(again)09:51:12
@rick:matrix.ciphernetics.nlMindaviProbably yeah10:57:31
@k900:0upti.meK900All right, let's see if it blows up this time11:05:21
20 Feb 2025
@tobim:matrix.orgtobim joined the room.09:58:16
@p14:matrix.orgp14 I'm seeing something quite weird with gmpxx whereby it will succeed/fail at the configure stage checking build system compiler gcc... yes based on something bogus in the environment. I'm wondering whether its success/failure is actually conditioned on something arbitrary relating to what's in the environment somehow. I've made a build hook; with makeSetupHook which I'm putting in the stdenv's extraNativeBuildInputs. Loads of other packages build fine but not gmpxx. I can comment out preBuildHooks+=(something) or put it back, and this makes it pass/fail. The compiler detection fails unable to find libc. 11:03:37
@p14:matrix.orgp14Interestingly a develop shell reliably fails so I can't figure out why it's working in the working case.11:04:49
@p14:matrix.orgp14I think I'm hitting a variant of https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/issues/265121, that the buildPackages.stdenv.cc doesn't work as expected in a pkgsLLVM environment.11:05:35
@p14:matrix.orgp14(because gmpxx uses this)11:05:45
@p14:matrix.orgp14Right, figured it out. My develop environment was failing because of contamination from a direnv environment causing the wrong targetOffset, which meant I was trying to debug the wrong thing. And the preBuildHook was actually affecting the configure phase but later.11:55:47
@p14:matrix.orgp14* Right, figured it out. My develop environment was failing because of contamination from a direnv environment causing the wrong targetOffset, which meant I was trying to debug the wrong thing. And the preBuildHook was actually affecting the configure phase but later; owing to how it affected the inputs to the derivation.11:56:01
21 Feb 2025
@rosscomputerguy:matrix.orgTristan RossI'm kinda wondering if it's possible to do "cross" things without activating the cross logic that causes the prefix/suffix to be added in. If it could be done with toolchain stuff and CPU model stuff, that'd be nice. For toolchains, we'll probably need multiple bootstrap tarballs. A base and then one for each toolchain.16:39:58
22 Feb 2025
@p14:matrix.orgp14 I totally want that and don't think there is a way. Even more, I'd love a way to be able to customize the tags that end up on package names, so we have more than just the -static marker. I totally think there should be an overridable function on the stdenv for controlling the markers. 07:48:38
@p14:matrix.orgp14 * I totally want that and don't think there is a way. Even more, I'd love a way to be able to customize the tags that end up on package names, so we have more than just the -static marker. I think there should be an overridable function on the stdenv for controlling the markers. 07:48:47
@p14:matrix.orgp14 * I totally want that and don't think there is a way. Even more, I'd love a way to be able to customize the tags that end up on package names, so we have more than just the -static marker. I think it would be awesome to have an overridable function on the stdenv for controlling the markers. 07:49:00
@p14:matrix.orgp14 * I totally want that and don't think there is a way. It's currently keyed off stdenv.buildPlatform != stdenv.hostPlatform. Even more, I'd love a way to be able to customize the tags that end up on package names, so we have more than just the -static marker. I think it would be awesome to have an overridable function on the stdenv for controlling the markers. 07:51:55
@trofi:matrix.orgtrofi I wonder how cross-packages get their prefix. Maybe via stdenv.mkDerivation override? 14:18:09
@artturin:matrix.orgArtturin
In reply to @trofi:matrix.org
I wonder how cross-packages get their prefix. Maybe via stdenv.mkDerivation override?

Suffix https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/blob/d91510fa191473465fd66e61f1cd4a1f838ee649/pkgs/stdenv/generic/make-derivation.nix#L382

Compiler prefix https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/blob/d91510fa191473465fd66e61f1cd4a1f838ee649/pkgs/build-support/cc-wrapper/default.nix#L99

14:32:34

Show newer messages


Back to Room ListRoom Version: 9