| 23 Aug 2025 |
 emily | *
Note that options such as --driver-mode=, --target=, -m32 affect the search algorithm. For example, the aforementioned executable called with -m32 argument will instead search for:
| 01:01:15 |
| emily | https://clang.llvm.org/docs/UsersManual.html#configuration-files | 01:01:18 |
 John Ericson | ok cool | 01:01:25 |
| John Ericson | I guess whoever made the multilib yaml didn't know about this :D | 01:02:29 |
| emily | I think it's specifically for configuring the GCC multilib interface | 01:05:42 |
| emily | but yeah, some overlap | 01:06:02 |
| emily | maybe the multilib stuff could be useful, it seems a little baroque though | 01:06:11 |
| John Ericson | yeah all I want is the conceptual parts | 02:21:56 |
| John Ericson | -print-multi-lib itself is only for building GCC with --enable-multilib, and the whole point of GCC NG is you get the benefits from that without needing to do that | 02:22:32 |
| John Ericson | so...nope! not needed! | 02:22:37 |
| emily | we kind of want multilib to kill off i686-linux builds | 02:25:14 |
| emily | but that's another matter | 02:25:18 |
| 24 Aug 2025 |
 ris_ | rebased & retested https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/414987 today - would be nice to get this & the clang equivalent into 25.11 | 19:38:03 |
| emily | does anyone know if there is a particular reason we pass env.NIX_CFLAGS_COMPILE etc. down to Fortran compilers | 22:41:22 |
| emily | https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/issues/27218 https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/issues/436510 | 22:41:35 |
| 27 Aug 2025 |
|  connor (he/him) (UTC-5) changed their display name from connor (he/him) (UTC-7) to connor (he/him) (UTC+1). | 18:33:42 |
| 28 Aug 2025 |
 Philip Taron (UTC-8) | You're a committer, right? | 22:36:11 |
| ris_ | yup, will look back at this tomorrow | 22:36:50 |
| 29 Aug 2025 |
|  陈浩南 changed their profile picture. | 05:06:54 |
|  dish [Fox/It/She] joined the room. | 13:45:08 |
|  Sigmanificient joined the room. | 18:57:16 |
 j-k | dish [Fox/It/She]: I think this is one of the last minimal boostrap discussions I recall seeing. (In-case you're interested) | 19:25:12 |
| emily | I believe it's much further along than that by this point? | 19:35:56 |
| emily | I heard that most of the remaining work is just "wiring it up" | 19:36:09 |
| dish [Fox/It/She] | love that matrix doesnt let me load that message for some reasoj | 20:07:10 |
| dish [Fox/It/She] | * love that matrix doesnt let me load that message for some reason | 20:07:17 |
| dish [Fox/It/She] | truly a matrix moment | 20:07:25 |
| dish [Fox/It/She] | anyways yes i would love to help contribute to getting all of this wired up and actually enabled in nixpkgs | 20:08:12 |
| dish [Fox/It/She] | theoretically it should let us remove quite a few binary bootstrap tarballs | 20:08:45 |
 Ramses 🇵🇸 | I haven't seen anything about the minimal bootstrap recently and I kind of assumed that the effort ran out of steam. People are still working on this? Is there any up-to-date into online? | 20:41:02 |
