| 17 Apr 2026 |
|  @robin:robin.town left the room. | 19:15:11 |
| 20 Apr 2026 |
|  Four changed their display name from bivsk to Four. | 14:16:34 |
|  Lisanna joined the room. | 16:53:25 |
| Lisanna | Hello! I'm looking for input on the current draft of my PR which is moving the nix develop devshell functionality into stdenv. I am currently blocked on this because I need some guidance on which direction to go - rewrite in bash or rewrite in C++ (today half of it is in bash, the other in C++). See my most recent comment on the PR. I tried C++ but I'm wondering about the dependencies this introduces, esp. if you're wanting to extend this for bootstrap derivations. The PR is https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/509697 | 17:01:02 |
 K900 | Given all of stdenv is already bash, I feel like bash is the way to go | 17:23:51 |
| Lisanna | alright, I'll see how feasible rewriting makeRcScript in bash is. I think I can do it without actually needing the Store stuff | 17:26:51 |
| Lisanna | * alright, I'll see how feasible rewriting makeRcScript in bash is. ~~I think I can do it without actually needing the Store stuff~~ The Store stuff might just have to stay in nix develop to support the --redirects flag, but everything else should be doable in bash | 17:37:25 |
| 21 Apr 2026 |
|  zoë (@blokyk) changed their display name from zoë (she/her) to zoë (@blokyk). | 03:08:38 |
| Lisanna | 
Download image.png | 04:27:47 |
| Lisanna | oh bash, how I love you | 04:27:56 |
 Sigmanificient | Noticed that some attrs where missing in stdenv.meta :o
https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/512181 | 20:36:11 |
| 25 Apr 2026 |
| Lisanna | Tbh I'm surprised stdenv even has a meta, like, it's not a package, should lib also have a meta? | 20:28:21 |
| Sigmanificient | nix-repl> stdenv
«derivation /nix/store/q2xn5647kadsgpz40xcmjssa0pmdmiwi-stdenv-linux.drv»
| 20:30:07 |
| Lisanna | Wait what | 20:30:23 |
| Sigmanificient | 😄 | 20:35:30 |
| 27 Apr 2026 |
|  Ninja joined the room. | 14:31:41 |
| 30 Apr 2026 |
|  llakala joined the room. | 03:41:06 |
 dish [Fox/It/She] | woohoo gcc 16 release | 15:31:01 |
| dish [Fox/It/She] | we can finally compile all those algol68 programs | 15:37:00 |
| dish [Fox/It/She] | notable that it moves from default cpp17 to cpp20 | 15:37:19 |
 whispers [& it/fae] | init at https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/515185 | 23:59:55 |
| 1 May 2026 |
| Sigmanificient | god i still use gcc 8.4.0 at work 😭 | 11:03:07 |
| Sigmanificient | * god i still use gcc 8.4.0 at work 😭
And yes, C++ | 11:15:41 |
| llakala | i'd appreciate a look at https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/513858 when people have a chance. I have several other similar PRs up, but this one gives the largest stats improvement, so I thought I'd start with it <3 | 17:03:30 |
| llakala set a profile picture. | 17:12:28 |
| 4 Aug 2022 |
|  Winter (she/her) joined the room. | 03:27:09 |
|  [0x4A6F] joined the room. | 22:08:01 |
| 6 Aug 2022 |
| Winter (she/her) | Does anyone know where the fact that the Darwin stdenv builds CMake twice comes from? As far as I can tell, it's from stage 0, and then just gets used in the other stages from there. Am I missing something here, is it something with the overrides? It looks like it might be, but then the fact that those are only allowed in the final stage (per booter.nix) (when that doesn't seem true, since then they wouldn't be defined...?) comes up.
(Isn't this the same pattern (defining in one stage and referencing in the others) that makes Glibc only build a limited number of times in the Linux stdenv?) | 08:00:17 |
 trofi | You think cmake should be rebuild less? Or more?
glibc's is probably a bit different as it's a part of stdenv.cc.libc and mainly used by that I would guess. Also, if depends if the package is used or not by other packages in the derivation would affect rebuild count as well.
| 14:59:09 |
| trofi | Looking at stdenv's dep tree I see 2 cmake-boot hashes and one cmake hash: https://dpaste.com/8GGM6P9BF.txt | 15:03:11 |
