!OqhvaDMJdKYUicLDiE:nixos.org

Nixpkgs Stdenv

181 Members
57 Servers

Load older messages


SenderMessageTime
31 May 2025
@hexa:lossy.networkhexa* because permission levels are a per room setting16:53:40
@grimmauld:grapevine.grimmauld.deGrimmauld (any/all)Well then. Can someone invite @benjaminsparks:chat.alugha.app ?18:33:30
1 Jun 2025
@mjolnir:nixos.orgNixOS Moderation Botchanged room power levels.03:03:22
@uep:matrix.orguepRedacted or Malformed Event03:04:10
@uep:matrix.orguepRedacted or Malformed Event03:04:16
@uep:matrix.orguep invited @benjaminsparks:chat.alugha.appBen Sparks.03:05:01
@uep:matrix.orguepI have, but at least from where I sit, the room is public and shouldn't need an invitation03:25:20
@uep:matrix.orguepchanged room power levels.03:25:46
@benjaminsparks:chat.alugha.appBen Sparks joined the room.09:06:43
@seanthw:matrix.orgSean Thawe joined the room.23:48:46
5 Jun 2025
@Ericson2314:matrix.orgJohn Ericson https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/414321 Tristan Ross wanna review? 19:50:58
@rosscomputerguy:matrix.orgTristan Ross Why is it still called libcCross? Shouldn't we move that to just libc and have it apply even when not cross? 19:52:44
@Ericson2314:matrix.orgJohn Ericsondone!20:46:52
@Ericson2314:matrix.orgJohn Ericsonthanks for encouraging the scope creep :)20:47:01
@Ericson2314:matrix.orgJohn Ericsonfixing it was easier than I thought!20:47:07
@Ericson2314:matrix.orgJohn Ericsonglad this old tech debt is finally gone20:47:12
@Ericson2314:matrix.orgJohn Ericsononce we get rid of the old gcc20:47:18
@Ericson2314:matrix.orgJohn EricsonI think we can finish the job of having nothing with "cross" in its name20:47:34
@rosscomputerguy:matrix.orgTristan RossYeah, there's a few things I think that could be done in that PR lol.20:47:39
@Ericson2314:matrix.orgJohn EricsoncrossLibcStdenv -> libcStdenv20:47:39
@rosscomputerguy:matrix.orgTristan RossYeah, ideally you should be able to refer to toplevel attributes for the different components20:47:59
@rosscomputerguy:matrix.orgTristan RossThe idea is then you can utilize whatever you need without going through the CC wrapper.20:48:15
@rosscomputerguy:matrix.orgTristan Ross Like for example, if something wants to link to the libc without knowing the CC then it just does pkgs.libc 20:48:45
@Ericson2314:matrix.orgJohn Ericsonyeah20:49:34
@Ericson2314:matrix.orgJohn Ericsonharder for tools as we discussed before20:49:56
@Ericson2314:matrix.orgJohn Ericsonbut for libs there is no problem20:50:05
@Ericson2314:matrix.orgJohn Ericsonwe should just do it!20:50:09
6 Jun 2025
@creepinson:matrix.org@creepinson:matrix.org left the room.00:18:43
@reckenrode:matrix.orgRandy Eckenrode pkgs.libc does nothing on Darwin. The libc is in the SDK. It needs to be to allow the libc to be overridden. The only way I can see breaking it out is to completely remove the link from cc-wrapper to libc and rely exclusively on libc being a package in the inputs (and I still expect some things to do the wrong thing). 13:56:14
@reckenrode:matrix.orgRandy Eckenrode * pkgs.libc does nothing on Darwin. The libc is in the SDK. It needs to be there to allow the libc to be overridden. The only way I can see breaking it out is to completely remove the link from cc-wrapper to libc and rely exclusively on libc being a package in the inputs (and I still expect some things to do the wrong thing). 13:56:22

Show newer messages


Back to Room ListRoom Version: 9