| 26 May 2025 |
 Tristan Ross | I consider it part of the "defacto standard Linux environment" | 21:04:27 |
 Grimmauld (migrated to @grimmauld:m.grimmauld.de) | tbf, fhs-compliance is also part of the de-facto standard... | 21:04:57 |
| Tristan Ross | Kinda like GNU coreutils | 21:05:01 |
| Grimmauld (migrated to @grimmauld:m.grimmauld.de) | nothing that can't be fixed given enough patches | 21:05:08 |
| Tristan Ross | In reply to @grimmauld:grapevine.grimmauld.de
tbf, fhs-compliance is also part of the de-facto standard... Well, we're exempt from that | 21:05:13 |
| Grimmauld (migrated to @grimmauld:m.grimmauld.de) | i quite enjoy building the same thing with different toolchains - it shows where the flaky parts are, where assumptions are being made that might not hold | 21:06:11 |
| Grimmauld (migrated to @grimmauld:m.grimmauld.de) | not having gcc would be fancy. | 21:06:24 |
 trofi | would be nice not to have a cross-only llvm | 21:06:41 |
| trofi | but having an llvm-only bootstrap would be a good test if it's easy to make a componentized-gcc bootstrap | 21:07:09 |
| trofi | (i think it's very much not easy, but you already know that) | 21:07:33 |
| Tristan Ross | Yeah | 21:08:44 |
| Tristan Ross | I've already been looking into things to make it possible | 21:08:54 |
| Tristan Ross | One of the reasons why I've been working on fixing up pkgsLLVM | 21:09:11 |
| Tristan Ross | More things that work there, the better they'll work natively | 21:09:24 |
