!OqhvaDMJdKYUicLDiE:nixos.org

Nixpkgs Stdenv

233 Members
75 Servers

Load older messages


SenderMessageTime
4 Dec 2025
@grqp:matrix.orgGrqPI forgot about unsafeGetAttrPos. I thought nix repl :e would get me there but not so much.05:24:55
@winter:catgirl.cloudWinter :doc miiiight 05:47:08
@winter:catgirl.cloudWinterbut i forget if upstream nix has this05:47:17
@qyriad:katesiria.orgQyriad Neither makeWrapper nor makeShellWrapper have comments on them, so :doc doesn't help, bleh 11:13:06
@pyrox:pyrox.devdish [Fox/It/She]well they're not functions, they're packages, which is why they dont come up in :doc iirc16:09:33
@winter:catgirl.cloudWinterfunctions have :doc more than packages… :P19:09:15
@ilosariph2:matrix.orgIlosariph joined the room.19:22:03
9 Dec 2025
@aleksi:pikaviestin.fialeksiI've submitted a draft PR to support minimal-bootstrap on x86_64-linux, based on the previous PR to upgrade mes to 0.27.1. https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/469294 This is the specific delta for x86_64-linux: https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/compare/48c34b0b80801c8009a6b75728588cfee5468cff..9b6c3e609f671609f8b6add5dd572679f6527a5b15:29:09
@iblech:livingutopia.orgIngo Blechschmidt

I'm just a bystander, but: Awesome!!! Thank you so much for this work.

For anyone following along, I believe that this can be tested from the comfort of your couch by:

nix-build -I nixpkgs=https://github.com/Gskartwii/nixpkgs/archive/bootstrap-x86_64-linux.tar.gz "<nixpkgs>" -A make-minimal-bootstrap-sources
nix-build -I nixpkgs=https://github.com/Gskartwii/nixpkgs/archive/bootstrap-x86_64-linux.tar.gz "<nixpkgs>" -A minimal-bootstrap.test

I am doing this now (and expect no problems). There was one quickly fixed issue in the beginning, I got a hash mismatch for nyacc, probably because I had already tested an earlier version? (I resolved this by appending a do-nothing question mark to the nyacc URL, prompting a redownload, for which the hash successfully validated. But I don't fully understand the root cause of this issue. On a machine with a fresh cache, this issue did not arise.)

How hard would it be to drop pkgs/stdenv/linux/bootstrap-files (for x86_64)?

22:00:43
@pyrox:pyrox.devdish [Fox/It/She]since I don't have an understanding of how the current bootstrap-files mechanism works, difficult.22:33:02
@pyrox:pyrox.devdish [Fox/It/She]but with this it can be done soon22:33:07
@pyrox:pyrox.devdish [Fox/It/She]though this also requires more tools to be built first22:33:18
@pyrox:pyrox.devdish [Fox/It/She]see #45900222:33:38
@pyrox:pyrox.devdish [Fox/It/She] looked through the additional commits, nice work! 22:40:16
@rosscomputerguy:matrix.orgTristan RossI will look at aarch64-linux minimal-bootstrap lol22:42:36
@pyrox:pyrox.devdish [Fox/It/She]đź‘€22:44:34
10 Dec 2025
@iblech:livingutopia.orgIngo Blechschmidt *

I'm just a bystander, but: Awesome!!! Thank you so much for this work.

For anyone following along, I believe that this can be tested from the comfort of your couch by:

nix-build -I nixpkgs=https://github.com/Gskartwii/nixpkgs/archive/bootstrap-x86_64-linux.tar.gz "<nixpkgs>" -A make-minimal-bootstrap-sources
nix-build -I nixpkgs=https://github.com/Gskartwii/nixpkgs/archive/bootstrap-x86_64-linux.tar.gz "<nixpkgs>" -A minimal-bootstrap.test

I am doing this now (and expect no problems). There was one quickly fixed issue in the beginning, I got a hash mismatch for nyacc, probably because I had already tested an earlier version? (I resolved this by appending a do-nothing question mark to the nyacc URL, prompting a redownload, for which the hash successfully validated. But I don't fully understand the root cause of this issue. On a machine with a fresh cache, this issue did not arise.)

How hard would it be to drop pkgs/stdenv/linux/bootstrap-files (for x86_64)?

Edit. The test successfully concluded as expected.

00:03:42
@aleksi:pikaviestin.fialeksi

Thank you, I appreciate the testing. Credits to to dish and GNU Mes folks among others. I do want to check if I can reproduce the hash mismatch locally. I've seen issues like that, where they only appear after a gc cycle.

06:48:36
@aleksi:pikaviestin.fialeksi

Very exciting :D

06:49:08
@sarunint:matrix.sarunint.comSarun Intaralawan joined the room.13:34:47
@limosine:wir-sind-frey.de@limosine:wir-sind-frey.de left the room.18:05:40
@jmanch:matrix.orgJManch joined the room.23:23:17
11 Dec 2025
@pyrox:pyrox.devdish [Fox/It/She] @aleksi I've force-pushed my PR to fix merge conflicts, please update your PR and then I'll merge it in the next few days(probably over the weekend) once I do a better review of it 04:24:20
@pyrox:pyrox.devdish [Fox/It/She]thank you again for all your work! Really amazing to have this as an option04:24:31
@creepinson:matrix.org@creepinson:matrix.org left the room.06:15:56
@theo-paris:matrix.orgTheo Paris joined the room.06:20:08
@aleksi:pikaviestin.fialeksi

Awesome! I've updated my PR as well. I am open to joining the minimal-bootstrap team as well if it needs more hands

09:54:06
@aleksi:pikaviestin.fialeksi

Oh and I tested the builds post-GC and didn't get any FOD issues (:

09:56:28
@suua:matrix.orgsuua joined the room.16:12:57
@pyrox:pyrox.devdish [Fox/It/She] Feel free to add yourself to the team in the PR, and if you do so, please add me as well!(my maintainers attribute is pyrox0 20:45:00

Show newer messages


Back to Room ListRoom Version: 9