| 20 Dec 2024 |
 K900 | It isn't | 20:16:41 |
| K900 | If you think just having a compiler target allows you to compile arbitrary things, that's not the case | 20:17:01 |
| K900 | And neither is having a libc, really | 20:17:09 |
 Tristan Ross | A lot of things would require patches to work but at least having a toolchain would be possible | 20:18:03 |
| Tristan Ross | I don't expect a whole lot to work | 20:18:48 |
| K900 | If you want to burn cycles on silly targets that LLVM supports just because LLVM supports them, do MSVC | 20:19:10 |
| K900 | At least that might actually be useful in like five years | 20:19:19 |
| 21 Dec 2024 |
|  stablejoy left the room. | 05:08:19 |
|  @dmiskovic:matrix.org left the room. | 05:14:00 |
| stablejoy joined the room. | 06:43:25 |
| K900 | I think I brought this up before, but should we enable build-ids for everything | 07:36:51 |
 p14 | In reply to @k900:0upti.me
I think I brought this up before, but should we enable build-ids for everything Rationale? What are build-ids a function of and does it affect reproducible builds? (Presumably they don't, but would love to understand more what's going on and what they enable). | 11:03:43 |
| K900 | build-ids are basically a hash of the file | 11:11:21 |
| K900 | They're used for debug info matching | 11:11:28 |
| p14 | I see. Is there a pool of debug info somewhere I can easily utilise? | 11:12:08 |
| K900 | We don't build debug info for everything | 11:12:44 |
| K900 | But many things have it cached | 11:12:48 |
| K900 | You can use nixseparatedebuginfod | 11:12:52 |
| p14 | That's pretty cool; I'm wondering how does it connect thing being debugged to the derivation containing the separate debug info. Thinking aloud, presumably it does something like nix-store --query --deriver <path> and then look inside the derivation for the output named 'debug'. | 11:16:29 |
|  Dimitar joined the room. | 19:45:27 |
 Philip Taron (UTC-8) | I'd like to post this | 21:45:12 |
| Tristan Ross | In reply to @philiptaron:matrix.org
I'd like to post this On Discourse? | 21:47:20 |
| Philip Taron (UTC-8) | Yessir. | 21:47:27 |
| Tristan Ross | In reply to @philiptaron:matrix.org
Yessir. Sounds good | 21:48:30 |
| Tristan Ross | I'm thinking we can do a meeting sometime after the new year so we can figure things out for what the SC wants. | 21:50:31 |
| Philip Taron (UTC-8) | The sad (but also great) fact of the matter is that I'm most available over the next couple weeks, since I'm off of work. | 21:57:53 |
| Philip Taron (UTC-8) | Posted: https://discourse.nixos.org/t/community-team-updates/56458/11?u=philiptaron | 21:58:56 |
| Tristan Ross | Oh | 22:02:36 |
| Tristan Ross | Yeah, I'm available on Tuesday to Thursday this week | 22:03:56 |
| Tristan Ross | In reply to @philiptaron:matrix.org
Posted: https://discourse.nixos.org/t/community-team-updates/56458/11?u=philiptaron I thought you were meaning a different discourse post lol | 22:04:12 |
