Nixpkgs Stdenv | 230 Members | |
| 75 Servers |
| Sender | Message | Time |
|---|---|---|
| 25 Nov 2024 | ||
| it doesn't address trofi's concern, which comes up within a GCC build | 21:59:30 | |
| Right, I see now. Nix needs a DAG but it requires hacking into the GCC build system to untangle libstdc++ from g++. | 22:00:54 | |
Yeah, or patching built binaries after the fact to redirect to fresher libstdc++. | 22:23:26 | |
| 26 Nov 2024 | ||
| 07:49:11 | ||
| 27 Nov 2024 | ||
In reply to @trofi:matrix.orgI think it is still related | 06:34:27 | |
| Nix wants a dag, but the from-scratch bootstrap forces a dag | 06:34:38 | |
| in practice, reality does dictate it's a dag | 06:34:47 | |
| the way the world get around that in practice is bootstrapping to a fixed point | 06:35:02 | |
| * the way the world get around that in practice is bootstrapping to a fixed point, either byte-for-byte or just the ABI | 06:35:20 | |
In reply to @philiptaron:matrix.orgGood list! Would like to we the GCC repackaging on that list too :) | 06:35:57 | |
| what repackaging? | 06:36:33 | |
In reply to @Ericson2314:matrix.orgIt's a DAG from build step standpoint. But from installation directory standpoint gcc's own bootstrap allows installing libstdc++ and gcc multiple times to make sure both are using one another. nix does not allow for in place file updates and one has to resort to file copies from one store path into another and requires binary patching to achieve the same effect (which is fragile for self-references and effectively requires CA compatibility as a precondition). | 06:56:31 | |
Luckily gcc is CA-compatible, but glibc is not. As a result I have to use hacks like https://bpa.st/raw/5QWA just to make glibc work in CA (and in cases when I have to rewrite references to relocate glibc) :) | 07:02:13 | |
__FILE__ has been a persistent painful cause of "trivial" self-references / unwanted references for me lately | 07:08:30 | |
| not even with CA derivations | 07:08:33 | |
| At least macro expansion should be worked around by https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/blob/master/pkgs/development/compilers/gcc/patches/13/mangle-NIX_STORE-in-__FILE__.patch | 10:50:46 | |
| emily: I was working on a branch with Philip Taron (UTC-8) that builds GCC in parts like we do with LLVM | 15:03:08 | |
| we are both pressed for time, but I very much want to see it done, as it cuts down on rebuilds and makes cross sane | 15:03:26 | |
| 18:17:59 | ||
| I see | 19:10:12 | |
fwiw we probably need to un-split some LLVM stuff since some of it is pretty broken. e.g. Clang having separate lib output breaks unwrapped compilers | 19:10:38 | |
| 28 Nov 2024 | ||
| 18:48:46 | ||
| 18:50:23 | ||
| 1 Dec 2024 | ||
| 00:08:07 | ||
| 10 Dec 2024 | ||
| https://crab.fit/nixpkgs-stdenv-team-meeting-699727 made a crab fit thing to find the availability of everyone so we can work on our updates to give to the SC. | 05:33:42 | |
| Minor quality of life improvements:
| 09:12:53 | |
| 11 Dec 2024 | ||
| 14:19:13 | ||
| 12 Dec 2024 | ||
I'm trying to work out how to get a libcxxStdenv where my C++ dependencies are also built with libc++. I was thinking something along the lines of https://gist.github.com/DavidTruby/d0364e1637074a983a167fcecedd5847 but I couldn't get this to compile (fails to compile gettext)Am I even thinking along the right lines here? | 17:46:50 | |
In reply to @truby:matrix.orgYes. The problem is that gettext doesn’t support the newer llvm compiler. You could introduce an overlay to set llvmPackages = self.llvmPackages_17 (or whatever version is needed to build gettext) | 18:10:30 | |
| I thought the latest gettext fixed that? or has that not made it into nixpkgs yet? | 18:12:00 | |