!PSmBFWNKoXmlQBzUQf:helsinki-systems.de

Stage 1 systemd

81 Members
systemd in NixOs's stage 1, replacing the current bash tooling https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/projects/5125 Servers

You have reached the beginning of time (for this room).


SenderMessageTime
15 Apr 2023
@yinfeng:li7g.comYinfeng removed their profile picture.15:12:08
@yinfeng:li7g.comYinfeng set a profile picture.15:12:36
16 Apr 2023
@elvishjerricco:matrix.org@elvishjerricco:matrix.org flokli: I think I've addressed all the comments on the networkd PR. Can we hit the merge button sometime soon? 00:47:23
@elvishjerricco:matrix.org@elvishjerricco:matrix.org flokli: If flushBeforeStage2 is a blocker, let's split that out into a separate PR. I'm just confused why its a question now when it's been a part of scripted initrd for a long time. 16:34:03
@elvishjerricco:matrix.org@elvishjerricco:matrix.org * flokli: If flushBeforeStage2 is a blocker, let's split that out into a separate PR. I'm just confused why it's a question now when it's been a part of scripted initrd for a long time. 16:34:22
@hexa:lossy.network@hexa:lossy.networknot sure what is unclear about setting the network down before leaving stage116:39:03
@hexa:lossy.network@hexa:lossy.networkI consider that a mandatory step to not break network settings that stage2 wants to apply16:39:36
@elvishjerricco:matrix.org@elvishjerricco:matrix.org hexa: the systemd-networkd man page suggests not bringing things down before stage 2 so that everything stays configured all the way through. I think for the typical case, the configuration in stage 2 and stage 1 will be the same, so this seems fine to me? 16:40:46
@elvishjerricco:matrix.org@elvishjerricco:matrix.orgi.e. DHCP on interfaces X, Y, Z, and that's about it16:41:01
@hexa:lossy.network@hexa:lossy.networkwhat if I try to rename a link in my stage2?16:41:11
@elvishjerricco:matrix.org@elvishjerricco:matrix.orgI would say that's atypical16:41:19
@elvishjerricco:matrix.org@elvishjerricco:matrix.org and you can set flushBeforeStage2 = true for that :) 16:41:28
@hexa:lossy.network@hexa:lossy.networkbasically what you're saying is that people should configure their whole networking in stage1 as opposed to stage2?16:42:01
@elvishjerricco:matrix.org@elvishjerricco:matrix.orgNo?16:42:15
@elvishjerricco:matrix.org@elvishjerricco:matrix.org For stage 1, most people probably just want DHCP on one or all of the physical interfaces, as configured typically with networking.useDHCP or networking.interfaces.... Then stage 2 can take over network configuration and add any fancier things on top of that, but presumably most people will still want those same interfaces configured with DHCP 16:44:28

Show newer messages


Back to Room ListRoom Version: 6