!PSmBFWNKoXmlQBzUQf:helsinki-systems.de

Stage 1 systemd

82 Members
systemd in NixOs's stage 1, replacing the current bash tooling https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/projects/5126 Servers

Load older messages


SenderMessageTime
7 Mar 2023
@elvishjerricco:matrix.org@elvishjerricco:matrix.orgit also just feels weird to have dbus in initrd at all02:39:00
@elvishjerricco:matrix.org@elvishjerricco:matrix.orgI mean it'll be socket activated so the only cost will be size02:39:09
@elvishjerricco:matrix.org@elvishjerricco:matrix.orgbut still02:39:13
@lily:lily.flowers@lily:lily.flowers
In reply to @elvishjerricco:matrix.org
it also just feels weird to have dbus in initrd at all
Yeah, it does a bit
02:39:50
@lily:lily.flowers@lily:lily.flowers
In reply to @elvishjerricco:matrix.org
I mean it'll be socket activated so the only cost will be size
I imagine broker is much smaller if you only want to support one, though...
02:39:59
@elvishjerricco:matrix.org@elvishjerricco:matrix.orgI imagine supporting either will be pretty minimal in terms of size02:40:22
@elvishjerricco:matrix.org@elvishjerricco:matrix.org Well... I removed the dbus-daemon binary from the initrd and networkctl still worked... The dbus.service failed, but networkctl didn't seem to care? 03:06:42
@elvishjerricco:matrix.org@elvishjerricco:matrix.orgwtf03:06:52
@elvishjerricco:matrix.org@elvishjerricco:matrix.org oh, just networkctl status worked; nothing else seemed to 03:11:09
@elvishjerricco:matrix.org@elvishjerricco:matrix.org Finally marked this as ready for review: https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/169116 04:56:39
@elvishjerricco:matrix.org@elvishjerricco:matrix.orgIt's slightly a hodgepodge of a bunch of little requirements to make everything work, so you might want to take it a commit at a time04:57:33
@andi:kack.it@andi:kack.it That is reading the internal key-value files in /run 10:34:23
9 Mar 2023
@lily:lily.flowers@lily:lily.flowers Janne Heß: Do you think you could clarify the license situation for https://github.com/helsinki-systems/plymouth-theme-nixos-bgrt? I would like to package it in nixpkgs, if that's okay 23:45:27
10 Mar 2023
@hexa:lossy.network@hexa:lossy.networkoh, a spinning logo 😄00:05:24
@hexa:lossy.network@hexa:lossy.networki want it00:05:34
@hexa:lossy.network@hexa:lossy.network Janne Heß: make it happen! 00:05:40
@janne.hess:helsinki-systems.de@janne.hess:helsinki-systems.de
In reply to @lily:lily.flowers
Janne Heß: Do you think you could clarify the license situation for https://github.com/helsinki-systems/plymouth-theme-nixos-bgrt? I would like to package it in nixpkgs, if that's okay
Sure, what do you want? Mit?
07:11:04
@janne.hess:helsinki-systems.de@janne.hess:helsinki-systems.deAlso have you tested it first? I don't even remember if it looks good07:13:13
@janne.hess:helsinki-systems.de@janne.hess:helsinki-systems.de
In reply to @janne.hess:helsinki-systems.de
Sure, what do you want? Mit?
Or does it have to be CC-BY? that's what the logo is under. If only licensing wasn't what it is… 
07:33:46
@lily:lily.flowers@lily:lily.flowers
In reply to @janne.hess:helsinki-systems.de
Or does it have to be CC-BY? that's what the logo is under. If only licensing wasn't what it is…
I mean the logo is cc-by and not cc-by-sa, so it doesn't necessarily need to be the same license. It just needs to have attribution
08:12:58
@lily:lily.flowers@lily:lily.flowers
In reply to @janne.hess:helsinki-systems.de
Also have you tested it first? I don't even remember if it looks good
Yeah it does look good!
08:13:11
@lily:lily.flowers@lily:lily.flowersI would say easiest is to just keep cc-by, though, same as the logo (my not-a-lawyer understanding is that cc licenses better accomodate creative works like this anyway rather than something like MIT)08:16:08
@janne.hess:helsinki-systems.de@janne.hess:helsinki-systems.de

https://library.mit.edu.au/copyright/creativecommons

Looks like a readme attribution is enough. I wanted mit because it would be compatible with nixpkgs

08:28:42
@lily:lily.flowers@lily:lily.flowersYeah, just readme attribution is sufficient. It should be compatible with nixpkgs either way (pretty sure there's already cc assets in the repo), I mostly just care that it's licensed at all08:45:09
@dramforever:matrix.org@dramforever:matrix.orgcompatibility doesn't really matter unless you're pasting the repo contents into nixpkgd08:53:55
@dramforever:matrix.org@dramforever:matrix.org * compatibility doesn't really matter unless you're pasting the repo contents into nixpkgs08:53:56
@elvishjerricco:matrix.org@elvishjerricco:matrix.orgHuh... I just realized I think we're forcing initrd to be updated every time nixpkgs updates, even if nothing in initrd actually changed.09:07:48
@elvishjerricco:matrix.org@elvishjerricco:matrix.orgBecause of this: https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/blob/88bdb6d79b0bdf03d3338f6f3d1416a55ec199ab/nixos/modules/misc/version.nix#L18-L3809:08:16
@elvishjerricco:matrix.org@elvishjerricco:matrix.org The initrdRelease contains BUILD_ID, which includes the nixpkgs revision 09:08:32
@elvishjerricco:matrix.org@elvishjerricco:matrix.orgThat's not good09:08:47

Show newer messages


Back to Room ListRoom Version: 6