!PSmBFWNKoXmlQBzUQf:helsinki-systems.de

Stage 1 systemd

72 Members
systemd in NixOs's stage 1, replacing the current bash tooling https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/projects/5123 Servers

You have reached the beginning of time (for this room).


SenderMessageTime
4 Feb 2023
@jaen:matrix.orgjaenMaybe I'll see if I can get that cryptsetup version with `keyfilescript` and if it doesn't, I guess I'm just out of luck?21:14:28
5 Feb 2023
@k900:0upti.meK900Anyone else want to look at https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/210505 ?08:21:27
@k900:0upti.meK900I've been running it for ages now08:21:33
@k900:0upti.meK900Should probably just get it in08:21:38
8 Feb 2023
@elvishjerricco:matrix.org@elvishjerricco:matrix.orghttps://github.com/systemd/systemd/pull/2634803:12:31
@lily:lily.flowers@lily:lily.flowers
In reply to @elvishjerricco:matrix.org
https://github.com/systemd/systemd/pull/26348
I saw yuwata responded to your PR. Having a pre-any-filesystem sync point would make sense exactly for stuff like hibernate/resume, so I'm not sure what their motivation for limiting the change to just adding Before=sysroot.mount sysusr-usr.mount to systemd-hibernate-resume@.service is (and also shouldn't it be sysusr-usr.mount instead of sysroot-usr.mount, since sysusr-usr.mount comes first?)
15:20:12
@lily:lily.flowers@lily:lily.flowers Are they concerned about the local part of local-fs-pre? Because there could also just be a new pre-mount target they're after. Because resume docs for kernel are pretty clear it needs to come before all mounts, period 15:21:09
@lily:lily.flowers@lily:lily.flowers * Are they concerned about the local part of local-fs-pre.target? Because there could also just be a new pre-mount target they're after. Because resume docs for kernel are pretty clear it needs to come before all mounts, period 15:21:20
@elvishjerricco:matrix.org@elvishjerricco:matrix.org I'm worried they're going to tell me to create initrd-fs-pre.target 22:13:31

Show newer messages


Back to Room ListRoom Version: 6